Chris Fearnley writes ("Bug#1886: cern-httpd 3.0-4: a couple of bugs"):
> In http-conf, section "Users' Public HTML Directories", says that the
> default location for users' pages is in public_html, but the script
> sets the default to public-html.
Ian Jackson:
I'd be inclined to chan
I am rebuilding both the 1.2.13 and 1.3.43 kernels.
New features:
New BusLogic driver doesn't conflict with Adaptec, thus the default
kernel will work for BusLogic cards.
PPP updates.
ELF configured into the kernel, not a module.
- Bruce
--
Visit the "To
Hi,
I am sending this to the devel list, assuming that not many others have
converted to ELF yet.
Anyway, the subject says alot. I have had innd running on my system for
sometime. After loading all of the new ELF and A.OUT libs, innd doesn't
start. I get a message in the log that says:
in
I saw this come over comp.os.linux.announce. This would be a nice feature
to add to the ELF compiler.
Thanks
Bruce
from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Jones)
Subject: GCC bounds checking 2.7.1/1.0 released
*** GCC 2.7.1 with Bounds Checking: Version 1.0 released ***
The latest ver
Bill Mitchell writes:
Bill> Yesterday, I said I'd counted 1300+ and info and man files which
Bill> referred to /usr/local. It later struck me that this number is
Bill> totally unreasonable. I think I reversed the sense of the test.
Bill>
Bill> I've redone the test on what I current
On Fri, 24 Nov 1995, Andrew Howell wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes:
> > : xtet42 depends on X11R6 and recommends xserver. This is what Ian Murdoch
> > : said all X packages should do.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Second, the whole point of X, to me, is that you can run clients on one
> > machine and a ser
The following problem reports have not yet been marked as `taken up'
by a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OVER 9 MONTHS OLD - ATTENTION IS REQUIRED:
Ref PackageKeywords/Subject Package maintainer
379 mount Repeatable mount(1) problem wi Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
41
I think we need to make ELF part of the kernel for Debian-1.0. It doesn't
make sense to have it as a module anymore.
Jeff
>
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.01?
>
> During boot up the harddisk is checked before the modules (binfmt_elf)
> are loaded. The fsck/e2fsck utility is elf dependend bu
> During boot up the harddisk is checked before the modules (binfmt_elf)
> are loaded. The fsck/e2fsck utility is elf dependend but can't run
> without the module being loaded.
Ah! Good point. Ok, guys... how to handle this? I have recompiled elf
support directly into the kernel (seeing as how
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.01?
During boot up the harddisk is checked before the modules (binfmt_elf)
are loaded. The fsck/e2fsck utility is elf dependend but can't run
without the module being loaded.
--
Erick [EMAIL PROTECTED] +31-10-4635142
Department of General Surgery (Intensive Care) Univ
Bdale Garbee writes:
> : xtet42 depends on X11R6 and recommends xserver. This is what Ian Murdoch
> : said all X packages should do.
>
> I don't understand why this makes sense, for two reasons. Ian M, was there
> some other good reason for this suggestion that I've missed?
>
> First, in general
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: Kenny Wickstrom writes:
: > My X server is
: > on my Win 95 machine. So to get xtet42 to install I needed to add the
: > --force-depends to the dpkg command line.
: xtet42 depends on X11R6 and recommends xserver. This is what Ian Murdoch
: said all X
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: > We should document what we ship as we ship it.
: No argument, but that implies lots of work for maintainers
: when initially building packages and when upgrading to new
: upstream releases. I'm not sure that it's practical.
I think it's necessary.
13 matches
Mail list logo
