On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 22:05:23 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Fwiw, I wouldn't mind if pkg-fdo and pkg-utopia would be merged (but I
> don't have a good suggestion for a different name).
I'm happy for dbus and related packages to be "owned" by any (or no) team,
as long as uploaders are careful and
Package: gnome
Version: 1:3.30+1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: Jonathan Dowland ,
debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org, debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
On the debian-devel mailing list, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was surprised to learn — by way of synaptic being autoremoved — that
> the default
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 10:50:10 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On the subject of Wayland's readiness to be the default Debian desktop display
> system for Buster, I've just filed #928002 to track problems with
> drag-and-drop
> between X and non-X applications under Wayland (presently filed agai
> What I would really like to see, please, is pointers to the criteria used in
> the decision making for switching to Wayland-for-default.
I cannot give you those criteria. I don't think there was any sort of
formal document listing requirements that had to be met, any more than
there was for stre
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 17:33:55 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> So far as I am aware there is still radio silence from active GNOME
> packaging team members regarding this issue. No comment yet on the
> patch I adapted, positive or negative; this bug (#927667) remains
> at an RC severity.
(Adding
I've prepared a GLib update for stretch, which works OK in a GNOME
virtual machine, but I no longer have any stretch desktops in real use.
If you are still using Debian stretch with libglib2.0-0 on a production
machine, please could you try this proposed update and check that it
doesn't cause obvio
-1,3 +1,32 @@
+gnome-shell (3.30.2-11~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload
+ * Recompile for Debian 10
+ * d/gbp.conf: Change packaging branch to debian/buster
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Sun, 18 Aug 2019 19:50:59 +0100
+
+gnome-shell (3.30.2-11) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team up
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:41:31 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I uploaded some mutter fixes to unstable after the buster release which
> I think would be worth considering for a buster update - perhaps for
> 10.2 rather than 10.1 at this point.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 08:44:47 +01
Package: xfce4-session
Version: 4.16.0-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
xfce4-session installs an essentially empty template file
"debian/defaults.list" as a conffile /etc/xfce4/defaults.list, with a
symbolic link at /usr/share/xfce4/applications/defaults.list to
Package: xfce4-session
Version: 4.16.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
In #1004711, a user of XFCE and GIMP reported that a "wrong" application
was used to open PDF print previews. It seems that GTK was configured to
use something that follows the freedesktop.org M
Package: plasma-workspace
Version: 4:5.23.5-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
Steps to reproduce:
- Install task-kde-desktop
- Also install gimp, nautilus and libglib2.0-bin
- Have a PDF file (if you're testing in a VM like I was, there's one in
/usr/share/doc/sha
I have been looking into two GTK merge requests [!6] and [!9], trying to
figure out which one is the better candidate for a bullseye stable update.
[!6]: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk3/-/merge_requests/6
[!9]: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gtk3/-/merge_requests/9
This is an attemp
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 at 17:35:23 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> GTK with merge request 6 (full backport from 3.24.29)
...
> With cups-browsed only: Two printers appear, labelled
> HP_Color_LaserJet_MFP_M277dw_xx and HP_Color_LaserJet_MFP_M277dw_xx_.
This seems to be a mismatch be
Here is hopefully a better solution for GTK 3 in bullseye:
https://people.debian.org/~smcv/bullseye-gtk-printing/mr6.1/
or if the release team will not accept that, then this:
https://people.debian.org/~smcv/bullseye-gtk-printing/mr9.1/
Please try those (in preference to mr6, mr9) and s
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org,
debian-print...@lists.debian.org, debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1005694
Control: block 982925 by -1
Control:
Package: desktop-base
Version: 12.0.6
Severity: normal
Tags: trixie sid
Now that Debian 12 has been released, the version of desktop-base in
testing should no longer include Debian 12 branding, so that the testing
installer will be visually distinct from the Debian 12 stable release.
The simplest
Package: xdg-desktop-portal
Version: 1.17.2-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com, debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/08/msg00311.html for more
context about what x-d-p is, what it's for, and how it is now set up.
At the moment w
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 01:52:49 +0200, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
> Le lundi 19 juin 2023, 20:50:35 CEST Simon McVittie a écrit :
> > Now that Debian 12 has been released, the version of desktop-base in
> > testing should no longer include Debian 12 branding, so that the testing
> &
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 at 16:08:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> All logos matching
> /usr/share/desktop-base/debian-logos/logo-text-version*
> currently contain a "12" left over from the Debian 12 release. I think
> they should have no specific vers
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/debian-desktop-team/desktop-base/-/merge_requests/9
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 23:45:23 +0300, Alexander Rusakevich wrote:
I wanted to change my gdm logo to one without version number, but with logo
icon and text. The logo-text
Package: gdm3
Version: 48.0-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
Tags: trixie sid
While reporting a separate bug about the Debian logo shown at the gdm
login prompt having poor contrast, I noticed that the accent colour
(org/gnome/desktop/interface/accent-color in d
Package: desktop-base,gdm3
Severity: important
Tags: trixie sid
Control: found -1 desktop-base/13.0.1
Control: found -1 gdm3/48.0-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
(I think this is really RC since it's a high-visibility issue with our
default desktop's branding, but filing as non
On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 10:55:58 -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 10:21 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
[The accent colour is]
chosen from a limited palette of presets rather than being
arbitrarily configurable, but the "teal" and "slate" choices look
va
Control: tags -1 = forky sid
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 at 18:13:40 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 at 16:08:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
All logos matching
/usr/share/desktop-base/debian-logos/logo-text-version*
currently contain a "12" left over from the Debian 12
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: xdg-desktop-por...@packages.debian.org,
debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:xdg-desktop-portal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
[ Reason ]
New upstream stable/bug-fix release.
[ Impact
#1106091)
+- Allow Flatpak and Snap apps to use portal APIs even if they do not
+ have a .desktop file matching the app-ID
+- Fix file descriptors being closed too soon, resulting in log noise
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Wed, 21 May 2025 11:05:04 +0100
+
xdg-desktop-portal (1.20.1+ds-
n if they
+ never explicitly modified it.
+
+ -- Simon McVittie Tue, 10 Jun 2025 14:16:06 +0100
+
+gnome-shell (48.2-1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream bugfix release
+- Track screen-time for the Wellbeing feature correctly across
+ suspend/resume, not counting time spent suspen
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 + plymouth grub-installer systemd-boot-installer
Tags: d-i forky sid
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-desktop@lists.debian.org
Prompted by a user question on IRC about whether/when Debian will
"include a boot screen like ubuntu" (which it alrea
025 at 14:17:19 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I can try to find time for some review, testing and unblock paperwork.
I have been trying to do this, but there's a lot, and I am not going to
be able to do all of it. Other GNOME team members or those with an
interest in our default desktop
29 matches
Mail list logo
