Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:21:10PM +0200, Ervin Dine wrote: > I have not had any problems with conman in my LXDE Debian 11 install > but if I may give my suggestion, gnome-network-manager works fine with > LXDE and it has more features. Why not bundle that instead of conman? > Conman does not even

Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

On Thursday, September 23rd, 2021 at 1:05 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 23.09.21 um 21:35 schrieb Jaycee Santos: > > Is there a reason why to choose gnome-network-manager over something like > > nm-tray for LXDE? > > I think nm-tray (being based on Qt5) is a reasonable c