Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

2021-09-23 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Andreas Tille wrote (Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:20:57 +0200): > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:21:10PM +0200, Ervin Dine wrote: > > I have not had any problems with conman in my LXDE Debian 11 install > > but if I may give my suggestion, gnome-network-manager works fine with > > LXDE and it has more fea

Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

2021-09-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > LXDE is one of the light-weighted desktops, and LXDE is not Gnome. Sure. That was the reason why I had choosen this as desktop for quite some old hardware. > So, if you add gnome-network-manager to the LXDE task, how much

Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

2021-09-23 Thread Jaycee Santos
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:21:10PM +0200, Ervin Dine wrote: > I have not had any problems with conman in my LXDE Debian 11 install > but if I may give my suggestion, gnome-network-manager works fine with > LXDE and it has more features. Why not bundle that instead of conman? > Conman does not even

Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

2021-09-23 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 23.09.21 um 21:35 schrieb Jaycee Santos: On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:21:10PM +0200, Ervin Dine wrote: I have not had any problems with conman in my LXDE Debian 11 install but if I may give my suggestion, gnome-network-manager works fine with LXDE and it has more features. Why not bundle that i

Re: connman does not respect /etc/network/interfaces when upgrading from buster to bullseye and more general considerations

2021-09-23 Thread Jaycee Santos
On Thursday, September 23rd, 2021 at 1:05 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 23.09.21 um 21:35 schrieb Jaycee Santos: > > Is there a reason why to choose gnome-network-manager over something like > > nm-tray for LXDE? > > I think nm-tray (being based on Qt5) is a reasonable choice for LXQT (which >