y much for your time!
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/debbugs.html
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4
tag 484789 - pending
thanks
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:10:47 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:48:24 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> > If it's pending, this means that I've fixed it and have deployed a fix
> > on b.d.o, and it will be fixed in the pac
way, if you install apt-listbugs, you could even perform this
test by yourself, so that you can see exactly what you want to see!
Please let me know.
--
On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
"nano-documents" may lead you to my website...
ng seems to be a new upload of
debbugs!! ;-)
--
On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
"nano-documents" may lead you to my website...
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D F
On Tue, 19 May 2009 16:21:56 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
[...]
> On Wed, 20 May 2009, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> > Please upload a new version (and begin doing so more regularly!).
>
> See the logs of #477182 for what needs to happen before I upload a new
> version.
Wo
e, I am *not*
suggesting to alter those attribute values. I am just asking for
clarification on their meanings and on their names.
Please let us know.
Thanks for your time.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpZPgAyBp69M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:24:46 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2012, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > If my understanding of the four statuses is correct, it seems to me
> > that their names are a bit misleading
[...]
>
> It's this way for historical reasons, unfortu
2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp6Vwcq36394.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:43:45 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> in the present case, those names are something intended to be
> interpreted by programs and not directly by users (at least normally).
> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> As a consequence, the fact that apt-listbug
[pending,forwarded,pending-fixed,fixed,done].
-B : Filter bugs by number, showing only the specified bugs.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpuHpt2Qvd2x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:27:10 +0100 Justin B Rye wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > * -S | --stats
> >
> > Filter bugs by pending-state, showing only the bugs matching a
> > specified value. List the pending-state categories that you want to
> &g
Control: block 257873 by -1
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:38:50 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: debbugs
> Severity: wishlist
>
[...]
> I would need to call get_bugs() so that it returned an array with
> all the (unarchived) bug-numbers that apply to the specified b
Control: block 536613 by -1
Control: unblock 536613 by 553661
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 10:38:59 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 22:38:50 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
>
> > Package: debbugs
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> [...]
> > I
features, then I will be more than happy to test it
and give feedback to you.
It would be really great, if you could do this.
Thank you so much for your helpfulness!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
fsck is a four letter word...
..... Francesco
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: reassign -1 debbugs 2.4.1.1
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 21:28:01 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-06-19 19:06:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I propose that this bug report is reassigned to debbugs, requesting a
> > modification of the BTS t
Control: retitle -1 debbugs: should guarantee that merged bug reports share the
same "found" and "fixed" version lists
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:35:48 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I think that debbugs should
> guarantee that merged bug reports share the same &qu
nd versions
as strings, and never as numbers (even when they look like numbers!).
Please fix this issue, by forcing the SOAP interface to always send
fixed/found versions as strings.
Thanks for your time!
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpAHdYnxOQ9S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:36:38 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > However, the BTS SOAP interface apparently sends this fixed version
> > ("0.30") as a number (0.3), rather than as a string. As a consequence,
> > apt-listbug
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
I would have never thought that I would find myself filing a
"please package new upstream version" wishlist bug against
a Debian native package! ;-)
Nonetheless, here I am: the Debian BTS is a great bug tracking system
with many useful and
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.4.2~exp0
Severity: normal
Hi!
I think I found a bug in the BTS, hence I am reporting it against
the experimental version of debbugs (which I believe is the closest
version to what is used in the BTS, right?).
The following example use of apt-listbugs shows the problem
Package: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
as discussed via private e-mail with Don Armstrong, I would need the
following enhancement in the BTS SOAP interface, in order to enhance
apt-listbugs (which I maintain).
Currently, one of the procedures that apt-listbugs calls via SOAP is
get_bugs(), w
21 matches
Mail list logo
