et. But enough to
understand that there are good reasons to decline overruling.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ompiler toolchains.
What are the consequences of not staying up to date? I'm guessing
incoming bug reports from other packages wanting to use new features.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Hi Sean (2024.08.17_06:10:52_+0200)
> ===BEGIN BALLOT
>
> A: Christoph Berg
> B: Matthew Garrett
> C: Helmut Grohne
> D: Stefano Rivera
> E: Timo Röhling
> F: Craig Small
> G: Matthew Vernon
> H: Sean Whitton
>
> ===END BALLOT
I vote:
G > E > A
are happy to do, would consider doing, or is it
> off the table? That would help us see where we are.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1065416#108
>
> --
> Sean Whitton
Have you given this any thought yet?
Thank you,
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
-base to keep them up to date, where this was
> less critical for cross-compiler toolchains.
>
> What are the consequences of not staying up to date? I'm guessing
> incoming bug reports from other packages wanting to use new features.
I already put an assumption in there :P
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
for me to know before then, please?
Nonsense! Your video will be published very shortly, at this URL:
https://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2022/DebConf22/debconf22-322-meet-the-technical-committee.webm
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Hi Sean (2023.07.03_12:55:12_-0400)
> I would like to continue in the role, if the committee agrees.
From what I've seen, I support that.
> ===BEGIN
>
> A: Christoph Berg
> B: Matthew Garrett
> C: Helmut Grohne
> D: Simon McVittie
> E: Stefano Rivera
> F: T
ere in when the
moratorium was first imposed.
But I'm interested to see if there are other approaches suggested.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
es remind me of a bug I think I've seen in
apt-listchanges where it isn't ignoring changelog entries copied over
from a previous versioned source package (something like gcc-* or
python3.*). I can't reproduce it right now to file it, though :(
Does that sound familiar?
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
to make is appropriate, please seek explicit approval from the
> transition driver(s).
>
> OPTION N:
>
> None of the above.
>
> === END
I vote A > N
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
me wants to say yes.
Yeah, agreed on that.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Hi Sean (2024.03.09_22:06:42_-0400)
> ===BEGIN
> The Technical Committee recommends that Craig Small be
> appointed by the Debian Project Leader to the Technical Committee.
>
> C: Recommend to Appoint Craig Small
> F: Further Discussion
> ===END
I vote:
C > F
Ste
Hi Helmut (2024.04.29_06:33:40_-0400)
> > I am happy to continue to volunteer for the role, if the committee agrees.
> >
> > The ballot:
> >
> > ===BEGIN
> >
> > A: Christoph Berg
> > B: Matthew Garrett
> > C: Helmut Grohne
> >
each others needs in there, although it has now stalled a
month ago.
Helmut: it looks like #1081826 is waiting on you for some replies.
Ben, Bastian: #1081826 could benefit with a reply from the kernel team.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
mpelling. I think it's expected for systems to have logging available,
and init systemsi without built-in logging should probably depend on
system-log-daemon. This is not specified in the option (sorry, I didn't
catch this problem at the draft stage), but it's the logical outcome.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a couple of proposals for provides schemes.
Or reverting back to arch-any. I've pinged the bug.
My hope is that Bastian or the kernel team can just make a decision here
and implement it.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
the patch to
fix #1079329. I'm expecting that this will mean that the TC's decisions
have been carried out.
As things stand I don't think we need to be adding any blocks for
systemd.
Stefano
for the Technical Committee
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
ano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Matthew (2025.03.11_13:12:28_-0400)
=== BEGIN
A: Christoph Berg
B: Helmut Grohne
C: Matthew Garrett
D: Stefano Rivera
E: Timo Röhling
F: Craig Small
G: Paul Tagliamonte
H: Matthew Vernon
=== END
I vote:
H > A = B = C = D = E = F > G
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
ble as some others do. I think it's
OK for packages to adjust the behaviour of each other, when coordinated.
This isn't a situation where both sides think that this is the right
approach, so I can understand others voting it below F.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ystemd-nspawn on other distributions.
I vote B and C equally, as I believe the base-files maintainers can
select between these options (that they disagree with) themselves.
Stefano
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
for spam to all the teams listed on our project organization
page [2]. I think this is a good way to ensure that all core teams are
contacted, but I'm sure there's a lot of duplication.
[2]: https://www.debian.org/intro/organization
Stefano Rivera
for the DebConf Committee
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I have submitted a DebConf 25 meeting where we hope to work through some
of the remaining issues here:
https://debconf25.debconf.org/talks/221-cross-toolchain-package-structure-a-structured-conversation/
That's currently not world-visible, pending review from the content team.
I will have to requ
23 matches
Mail list logo
