Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#727708: Please clarify L options with regard to
> interfaces"):
>> I'm sorry, I missed the message that was a direct reply to me.
>>
>> I now understand Ian's position to mean that we must not require users
>> to select a certain init system for thin
Quoting: Steve Langasek
> So to make my position clear: L does not accurately reflect what I think we
> should be doing; but given the option between L and T, I was willing to vote
> L above FD and was not willing to vote T above FD because I think T
> unambiguously sets the stage for all other i
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 06:01:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I suppose what I mean is that a problem which occurs due to "wrong"
> init system is a real problem and should not be reduced in severity or
> excused on the grounds that the particular init system is defined as
> "required" (whether vi
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:51:56AM -0600, Tony Thedford wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2014 09:34 PM, Jason Frothingham wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
> Adopting systemd does not, in any way shape, form, idea, concept,
> conclusion, thought, etc. etc. etc. prevent, pervert, divert, etc. etc.
> etc. the go
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:15:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt writes ("Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote
> on init systems"):
> > Is there still anything left to discuss on tftp-hpa/upstart or could
> > this issue be closed? The last upload restored support for u
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 01:44:43PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> My view is that users should not be automatically switched when
> upgrading to jessie. As I said in my intro to #746578:
>
Just out of interest, had Upstrat been chose as the _default_ init system for
Debian, would you have had the s
6 matches
Mail list logo
