Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

2024-03-02 Thread Simon McVittie
I have proposed a change for glib2.0/experimental at https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/32 which implements the "delete the old postrm" approach. I would appreciate review and comments on whether this is something that would be acceptable to upload to experimental, and/or to

Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

2024-03-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:50 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I am currently downloading all versions of libglib2.0-0 that have > existed on amd64 as tracked by snapshot.d.o. My plan is to extract their > DEBIAN/postrm, import them into a git branch and go back through the > history that way. htt

Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on glib2.0 #1065022, file deletion by postrm during t64 transition

2024-03-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 02 Mar 2024 at 20:19:47 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I have proposed a change for glib2.0/experimental at > https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/32 which > implements the "delete the old postrm" approach. I've uploaded this to experimental, incorporating feedback fro