On 17/01/2024 14:07, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I somehow missed how Ben's libnfsidmap bug #1058937 works slightly
simpler. Given that $second has a conflict with the installed version of
$first, one can skip that second step and instead install $second
directly with dpkg -i. So no, this weird selecti
Hi,
On 12/01/2024 12:31, Helmut Grohne wrote:
For the gzip case, we have the additional question whether we tolerate
the temporary policy violation for the trixie upgrade or halt the
/usr-move and retry with a modified dpkg (that could land in trixie, so
we could complete in forky).
What's th
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 09:53:20AM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 12/01/2024 12:31, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> > For the gzip case, we have the additional question whether we tolerate
> > the temporary policy violation for the trixie upgrade or halt the
> > /usr-move and retry with a modified dpk
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 09:48:00AM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> To check I have understood correctly: one may see loss of files when doing
> dpkg -i of a package where it Conflicts: with an installed package?
Unfortunately, this is real.
apt avoids this, because it recognizes that it can remove
Your message dated Mon, 19 Feb 2024 21:42:14 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1060700: Requesting advice regarding the impact of
problems caused by aliasing on declared Conflicts
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060700,
regarding Requesting advice regarding the impact of problems
5 matches
Mail list logo
