Bug#841294: Overrule maintainer of "global" to package a new upstream version

2016-11-15 Thread Ron
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 04:55:06PM +, Wookey wrote: > On 2016-10-25 07:29 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > > > FWIW, it worked fine in a test run I just did (on linux-4.9 rc 1), and > > last time I used it, it also worked fine with the emacs integration, so > > I don't recognise the crying fr

Bug#841294: Overrule maintainer of "global" to package a new upstream version

2016-11-15 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
Hi, apologies for the delay in responding here. ]] Ron […] > I'd really like to keep this to just one package, for the reasons > already given (though there's surely more if anyone still needs > even more). This sounds pretty reasonable to me. > I'd really like to avoid "surprising" anyone u

Bug#841294: Overrule maintainer of "global" to package a new upstream version

2016-11-15 Thread Michael Biebl
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:32:38 +0100 Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > I think this sounds quite reasonable, all in all. It gets us a newer > version (albeit not for stretch, but I see the points about changing > that so close to the freeze), it gives users some warning about htags > going away (and if that