On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:05:46PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The reaction to every single instance of someone finding it a pain to
> maintain sysvinit support should not be "as a reminder, the TC has a
> giant hammer and will hit you with it". The reaction should be "are
> there people willing
Vincent Bernat writes ("Re: Bug#835507: Please clarify that sysvinit support
decision is not going to expire"):
> Maybe sysvinit users (and advocates) could answer to the current RFA on
> src:sysvinit (#811377). None of the people who volunteered half a year
> ago seemed to have carried on despite
]] Josh Triplett
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:14:25 +0100 Ian Jackson
> wrote:
> > Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#835507: Please clarify that sysvinit
> > support decision is not going to expire"):
> > > I don't want to make a blanket statement that it's a bug not to include
> > > an init script. Th
I agree on this too. To the extent it should be considered
time-limited, it should be «until N releases after sysvinit is removed»
or somesuch, if that happens.
In legal terms, in law, it would be considered that the burden of proof
lies with those who want to remove it.
Asking the supporter
> "Bart" == Bart Schouten writes:
>> I agree on this too. To the extent it should be considered
>> time-limited, it should be «until N releases after sysvinit is
>> removed» or somesuch, if that happens.
Bart> In legal terms, in law, it would be considered that the burden
]] Bart Schouten
> > I agree on this too. To the extent it should be considered
> > time-limited, it should be «until N releases after sysvinit is
> > removed» or somesuch, if that happens.
>
> In legal terms, in law, it would be considered that the burden of
> proof lies with those who want to
Sam Hartman schreef op 28-08-2016 1:37:
I'm nervous of going too far down the path of legalisms.
Asking those who need the scripts to prove (or even say) they still
need
them is not what we want.
However if someone is having difficulty maintaining the scripts or they
are broken, it is reason
7 matches
Mail list logo
