On 06/14/2015 05:10 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Therefore, I'm tempted to raise this to the technical committee
>> (putting their list as Cc). Does anyone see a reason why I am
>> mistaking here?
>
> Does a patch exist which can enable lz for orig.tar?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/14/2015 05:10 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Therefore, I'm tempted to raise this to the technical committee
>>> (putting their list as Cc). Does anyone see a reason why I am
>>> mistaking he
I here-by call for a vote on the following text (option A); the other
option is FD.
I will be out much of the next two weeks so if the vote becomes
resolved I'd appreciate it if someone could step in and announce the
decision.
Background/Rationale:
1. In #750135, the Technical Committee was ask
> "Sam" == Sam Hartman writes:
Sam> I here-by call for a vote on the following text (option A); the
Sam> other option is FD. I will be out much of the next two weeks
Sam> so if the vote becomes resolved I'd appreciate it if someone
Sam> could step in and announce the decision
> "Aron" == Aron Xu writes:
Aron> I don't hold a view on whether we want lz support in dpkg/dak,
Aron> but it could be a pity if we really involve CTTE for such an
Aron> issue. To me, it's sorta abusing the escalation process if
Aron> every individual developer raise an issue
Le lundi, 15 juin 2015, 08.08:27 Sam Hartman a écrit :
> I here-by call for a vote on the following text (option A); the other
> option is FD.
> (…)
> Using the power of the technical committee to provide advice (§6.1.5):
>
> 1. The Technical Committee agrees that Christian has the power to
>
On Jun 15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'm not at a stage where I want to involve the CTTE right now. I still
> would prefer to gather opinions and see where it goes.
My opinion is that you have not proved either that lz is widely used or
that it is "better" than xz.
--
ciao,
Marco
pgpiiNG5xE66F
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I here-by call for a vote on the following text (option A); the other
> option is FD.
I vote A > FD.
> I will be out much of the next two weeks so if the vote becomes
> resolved I'd appreciate it if someone could step in and announce the
> decision.
I c
8 matches
Mail list logo