Hi all,
Many thanks to Bdale for both his words and his work as Chairman over
all these years!
Le lundi, 9 mars 2015, 14.21:08 Bdale Garbee a écrit :
> === BEGIN
>
> The Technical Committee Chairman should be:
>
> A: Don Armstrong
> B: Andreas Barth
> C: Steve Langasek
> D: Kei
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> === BEGIN
>
> The Technical Committee Chairman should be:
>
> A: Don Armstrong
> B: Andreas Barth
> C: Steve Langasek
> D: Keith Packard
> E: Didier Raboud
> F: Tollef Fog Heen
> G: Sam Hartman
>
> == END
Thanks for the vote
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Mar 2015, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > === BEGIN
> >
> > The Technical Committee Chairman should be:
> >
> > A: Don Armstrong
> > B: Andreas Barth
> > C: Steve Langasek
> > D: Keith Packard
> > E: Didier Raboud
> > F: Tolle
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:33:49PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Option A Reached quorum: 5 > 2
> Option B Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> Option C Reached quorum: 3 > 2
> Option D Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> Option E Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> Option F Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> Option G Reached quorum: 4 > 2
Sinc
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:49:04PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:33:49PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Option A Reached quorum: 5 > 2
> > Option B Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> > Option C Reached quorum: 3 > 2
> > Option D Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> > Option E Reached quorum: 4 >
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:49:04PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:33:49PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > Option A Reached quorum: 5 > 2
> > > Option B Reached quorum: 4 > 2
> > > Option C Reached quorum: 3 > 2
> > > Option D Rea
Currently, the next CTTE meeting is scheduled for:
date -d 'Thu Mar 26 17:00:00 UTC 2015'
and in general, meetings are scheduled in that time slot on the last
Thursday of the month.
Given that we have new members, if anyone has a conflict with that time
slot, and would prefer that it was moved,
A couple of weeks ago I noticed mail to d-d-a talking about sprints at
debconf.
I'm wondering whether we want to try and spend a day at debconf or
debcamp exploring how we want to work together, how we want to resolve
issues, working on internal procedure, getting to know each other, that
sort of t
Don Armstrong writes:
> The outcome is no longer in doubt:
While this is true, I note that the constitution says we either need all
current members to vote or a week to pass for the vote to officially
conclude.
Regardless of how much longer it takes to be "official", congratulations
Don!
Bdale
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
>
> > The outcome is no longer in doubt:
>
> While this is true, I note that the constitution says we either need all
> current members to vote or a week to pass for the vote to officially
> conclude.
Quite right; sorry for jumpin
Bdale Garbee writes:
> === BEGIN
I know my vote isn't necessary to help determine the outcome of the
election, but I felt it would be useful to also record my support for
Don in this role.
A > (B | D) > (E | F | G) > (C | H)
Thanks much to both Bdale (for having served for nearly a decade as
c
Sam Hartman writes:
> A couple of weeks ago I noticed mail to d-d-a talking about sprints at
> debconf.
> I'm wondering whether we want to try and spend a day at debconf or
> debcamp exploring how we want to work together, how we want to resolve
> issues, working on internal procedure, getting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
06.03.2015 15:02, Sam Hartman wrote:
[]
> So, you're involving the TC because you're hoping to better understand why
> your unblock was not approved?
>
> How are you hoping the TC can help? Here are some options I see:
>
> * Some folks on the TC ar
13 matches
Mail list logo
