Steve,
first of all: why haven't you just talked to me? you know more then well
that i've kindly and quickly responded to all your bug reports, on and
offline. #746715 sounds like shooting with a nuclear weapon on little
glitch.
seccond, if you feel that deeply about that particular patch[1] and
* Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [140503 01:54]:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
> > Package: tech-ctte
> >
> > An Ubuntu developer just brought the following Debian changelog entry to my
> > attention:
> >
> > tftp-hpa (5.2-17) experimental; urgency=low
> >
> >* Removing upstart hacks, they are
Bdale Garbee (2014-05-02):
> However, since this is in experimental, and not in a released tree or
> release candidate, this particular case is hard for me to get worked
> up about.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tftp-hpa.html has the timeline for the
last few dozens uploads.
Last items are:
Ian Jackson :
> I have CC'd the packages@address for the package.
jftr, you haven't (tftpa-...@packages.debian.org !=
tftp-...@packages.debian.org).
but i have seen the bug by chance today when checking the ctte mailing
list in my inbox, so i guess no harm done/time lost.
--
Address:Dan
On 05/03/2014 10:05 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> if we think about overruling him, there might be better
> uses for.
such as?
i'm not aware of anything that would displease you in my packages, let
alone anything that would require to 'overrule' me. in the absence of
any bug report from you against
On 3 May 2014 09:31, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
> Steve,
>
> first of all: why haven't you just talked to me? you know more then well
> that i've kindly and quickly responded to all your bug reports, on and
> offline. #746715 sounds like shooting with a nuclear weapon on little
> glitch.
>
> seccond, i
I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
- Why are we loosing time to discuss the timeline of uploads, to see if
there was upstart support at some point
Le samedi 03 mai 2014 à 10:31 +0200, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> first of all: why haven't you just talked to me? you know more then well
> that i've kindly and quickly responded to all your bug reports, on and
> offline. #746715 sounds like shooting with a nuclear weapon on little
> glitch.
Wild g
Thomas Goirand writes ("Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
> I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
> accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
> wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
This is backwards.
If the maintainer had a prob
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
> the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
> merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting existing
> support without a comp
Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to support
> > the multiple available init systems in Debian. That includes
> > merging reasonable contrib
2014-05-03 19:53 GMT+02:00 Ian Jackson :
> Thomas Goirand writes ("Bug#746715: Shocking read ..."):
>> I'm really stoned by reading this bug. Daniel is nicely proposing to
>> accept patches from Steve, and re-add support for Upstart, and he just
>> wrote that Steve could have just get in touch.
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
