Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Dimitri John Ledkov > >> Fedora/RPM based distributions are significantly different, thus it is > >> inevitable that we'll have to maintain a fork of systemd for best > >> integration into Debian. This does not seem evident from the current > >> systemd maintainers, which file bugs to disable/

Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 02:18 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 5 January 2014 01:46, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Dimitri John Ledkov writes: > > > >> Imho that's a gross overstatement. Over more than a year, an Ubuntu > >> GNOME team was established and became official ubuntu flavour with so > >>

Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le samedi, 4 janvier 2014, 19.10:21 Josh Triplett a écrit : > Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Rejections on mailinglists and else where to split: > > /lib/systemd/systemd-multi-seat-x > > /lib/systemd/systemd-timedated > > /lib/systemd/systemd-localed > > /lib/systemd/systemd-logind > > /lib/systemd

Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 05 janvier 2014 à 01:37 +, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit : > > Patching upstream unit files to change paths is trivial, but even better > > would be to convince upstream to substitute in the proper path when > > building the unit file. > Oh that indeed would be wonderful, why did sys

Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:46:28 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote: > > I think systemd-ui is part of the systemd init system so falls into > > the exception. Of course that means that nothing else should depend > > (functionally or in package dependencies) on it. > There is no way that, for exa

Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Ian Jackson
Josh Triplett writes ("Bug#727708: init system discussion status"): > I don't subscribe to debian-ctte@; I read it via the list archives. > I've been replying using the "Reply to:" links at the bottom of mails, > and then manually copying and quoting the responses. Those links reply > to debian-ct

Bug#727708: init system discussion status

2014-01-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 at 00:54:04 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > post-208 rewrite, is interesting, burning bridges with dbus? As in all emails I write about this, I'm trying to be consistent about spelling the abstract specification "D-Bus" and its oddly-licensed reference implementation "dbus"