Package: tech-ctte
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I hereby ask the Technical Committee to resolve that:
1. As has already been done in the cups 1.5.3-4 package in experimental,
cups in wheezy will depend on "libcups2 (= ${binary:Version})" instead
of "libcup
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 692155 Dependency of cups on libcups2 in wheezy
Bug #692155 [tech-ctte] Please
Changed Bug title to 'Dependency of cups on libcups2 in wheezy' from 'Please'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Hi dear CTTE members, hi Adrian,
Considering:
a) that I have (possibly wrongly) interpreted Adrian's #668662#105 [0] as
offensive (and therefor took it too personally);
b) that I have therefor over-reacted in #668662#118 [1], including a call to
appeal to the tech-ctte, probably unneeded;
c)
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Now, as I already wrote, "I will be happy to have my judgment
> challenged." That's still true, so I'll let the either the tech-ctte
> or the bugreporter further handle this bug if considered necessary:
> I don't feel like closing it myself.
Thank
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes:
> f) that the vast majority of library depencies are handled with ">="
>dependencies despite no technical guarantees of ABI stability (besides
>Debian-specific symbol tracking);
While there are no *technical* guarantees, there is the expectation that
anyone
Hi Russ,
Thanks for your detailed summary, it's very helpful.
Le vendredi, 2 novembre 2012 23.47:11, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> In practice, divergence from the upstream SONAME practice is probably a
> bad idea. This business of having an exposed private API is dangerous and
> constitutes bad API
"Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes:
> Thanks for your detailed summary, it's very helpful.
Glad!
> Le vendredi, 2 novembre 2012 23.47:11, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> In practice, divergence from the upstream SONAME practice is probably a
>> bad idea. This business of having an exposed private API is
Your message dated Sat, 3 Nov 2012 01:47:28 +0200
with message-id <20121102234728.ge12...@bunk.dyndns.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#692155: Please
has caused the Debian Bug report #692155,
regarding Dependency of cups on libcups2 in wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:41:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes:
>...
> > Le vendredi, 2 novembre 2012 23.47:11, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> >> In practice, divergence from the upstream SONAME practice is probably a
> >> bad idea. This business of having an exposed priv
Adrian Bunk writes:
> Having a SONAME for such a library would cause other problems, e.g. the
> changes cherry-picked into 1.5.2-8 (that caused #668662) could result in
> a private library whose ABI would not match any upstream SONAME.
> Not an unsolvable problem (one could even automatically en
10 matches
Mail list logo
