Bug#441200: libconfig name clash

Julien Danjou writes: > At 1232576811 time_t, Carsten Hey wrote: >> I don't think this bug still makes any sense due to this facts. Should >> this bug be closed? > > I guess so. I concur. For the rest of the tech-ctte, to save reading through the bug log: * The original dispute was over the pa

Bug#441200: libconfig name clash

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Russ Allbery wrote: > For the rest of the tech-ctte, to save reading through the bug log: > > * The original dispute was over the package name "libconfig", which was > excessively generic. There was a package by that name in Debian > maintained by its author, and a separa

Bug#441200: libconfig name clash

Don Armstrong writes: > If there aren't any objections,[1] lets reassign this bug back to > src:libconfig while retitling and changing the severity to indicate the > problem. Sounds good to me. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#441200: libconfig name clash

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:45:53AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > I think it's still a bug that libconfig is using such a generic name, > but it's certainly one that can be made severity minor, tagged > upstream, and possibly wontfix'ed. Whatever the case, I don't think > the ctte needs to be involv