Hi Michael!
Adding the d-release mailing list to cc:.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:41:25 +0100, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> i'll go ahead and start the discussion since no one else is running
> with it. this matter is rather urgent since the problem is now being
> considered release-critical for lenny.
[
# please read it till the end before flame!
# speaking with my TC hat on
severity 449497 important
thanks
* Steffen Joeris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081031 14:31]:
> Dear Technical Committee Members
>
> Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package.
> Unfortunately, we do
* Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081028 10:08]:
> > reassign -2 tech-ctte
> Bug#503814: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware
> Bug reassigned from package `foo2zjs' to `tech-ctte'.
As this bug didn't get a decision from the release team yet, I'd propose
the followin
Hi there!
Can you please keep the foo2zjs-maintainer mailing list cc:ed? TIA.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:58:21 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Does the package work in most cases without this script run? Ie. does it
> have enough data to work with a majority of the printers and/or is enough data
> ava
ok, I think we should try to vote on this one:
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071127 21:25]:
> So I hereby formally propose the set of resolutions and (unaccepted)
> amendments implied by this DRAFT BALLOT:
>
> -8<-
>
> [Option D:]
> (1) The existing libconfig in Debian may retain its
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070830 06:16]:
> I would like to know if this upload would include the efika patches that
> where included in the subversion repository after the 2.6.22-3 upload,
> or if you will silently disable them, after you kicked me out of the
> debian-kernel team without r
On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> As this bug didn't get a decision from the release team yet, I'd propose
> the following decision by the tech ctte:
>
> 1. Currently, the submitter claims that the bug is serious, the
> maintainer don't think so, and there is no decision by the release
On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
> ok, I think we should try to vote on this one:
I would not disagree. BTW, I seem to be having some difficulty
getting -ctte emails, I certainly had not seen much of the discussion
on the BTS delivered to my mailbox. I have seen the discussion
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081031 22:20]:
> On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > ok, I think we should try to vote on this one:
>
> I would not disagree. BTW, I seem to be having some difficulty
> getting -ctte emails, I certainly had not seen much of the discussi
9 matches
Mail list logo
