Hello,
On Fri 22 Jul 2022 at 09:31am -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I respectfully disagree with Helmut who is pushing for an acceptable
> technical solution to be on the table before considering acting.
> As others have pointed out, it's actually hard to come up with the
> energy to improve and refin
On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 09:31 -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > > > > "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon writes:
>
> Matthew> While it's understandable, I am saddened and a bit
> worried
> Matthew> by the "it's too much hassle to fix dpkg's usr-merge
> Matthew> support, let's not bother" message
> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon writes:
Matthew> While it's understandable, I am saddened and a bit worried
Matthew> by the "it's too much hassle to fix dpkg's usr-merge
Matthew> support, let's not bother" message I seem to be getting
Matthew> from these threads.
I agree with y
Hi,
Not quite sure where in the relevant threads to put this concern, but.
On 17/07/2022 14:21, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 11:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
The patch from user uau that the dpkg maintainer rejected
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:42 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:03 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 14:21:30 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > By keeping
> > > the buildds in umerged-usr state for Bookworm, and switching them as
> > > soon as it is released
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:42 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:03 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 14:21:30 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > So the reasoning behind adding the override to debootstrap in --
> > > variant=buildd mode is twofold.
> > >
> >
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:49 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 13:42:21 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > And before release day, there's no such thing as a bookworm buildd,
> > right? Everything is built in unstable?
>
> As far as I know, bookworm buildd chroots already exist, an
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 13:42:21 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> And before release day, there's no such thing as a bookworm buildd,
> right? Everything is built in unstable?
As far as I know, bookworm buildd chroots already exist, and are used
for uploads to testing-proposed-updates and bookworm-sec
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 13:03 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 14:21:30 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > So the reasoning behind adding the override to debootstrap in --
> > variant=buildd mode is twofold.
> >
> > From a very practical perspective, it means it's supereasy to allo
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 14:21:30 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> So the reasoning behind adding the override to debootstrap in --
> variant=buildd mode is twofold.
>
> From a very practical perspective, it means it's supereasy to allow all
> those builds and tools you mentioned to run in unmerged-usr
On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 14:21 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 11:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Piuparts has been enhanced with a new test case that covers the
> > > moratorium on moving files manually between
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 13:03:36 -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> Hopefully I'm not too OT (please feel free to tell me if so! [1] would
> be an appropriate place to continue with more discussion on the topic)
> but another angle to this is the container images.
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/debuerreo
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 13:03 -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 06:21, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > That's because we will do all builds on unmerged-usr, until we are
> > sure
> > everything is switched over (and the autopkgtest/piuparts can also
> > be
> > turned over) in Bookworm+1,
On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 14:12 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 11:34:36 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> [some discussion of the transition to merged /usr]
>
> Please note that #994388 has been closed and archived, an
On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 11:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Piuparts has been enhanced with a new test case that covers the
> > moratorium on moving files manually between their location in the
> > root
> > directories and /usr.
>
> Th
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 11:34:36 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I personally agree that buildds should stay unmerged-/usr until the known
> bugs that would be triggered by merged-/usr buildds have been raised to
> RC severity, though. #992645 is a typical example. I'll try to have a look
> at those
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 11:34:36 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
[some discussion of the transition to merged /usr]
Please note that #994388 has been closed and archived, and does not
accept new messages, so I've removed it from Cc.
If you
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 00:56:14 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Piuparts has been enhanced with a new test case that covers the
> moratorium on moving files manually between their location in the root
> directories and /usr.
Thanks for doing this, it will help a lot.
> A MR is pending for debootstr
18 matches
Mail list logo
