* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071206 20:08]:
> For the avoidance of any doubt, I don't think that decisions of the TC
> should be interpreted as overruling the maintainer unless that is the
> only possible interpretation of the resolution's text.
>
> In the past it has always been clearly sta
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)"):
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:13:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > [1] Choice K: Keep current behaviour and existing policy, as above.
> > [2] Choice F: Further discussion
>
> I agree
Andreas Barth writes ("Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)"):
> I assume the voting means "we are not overriding the maintainer", i.e.
> this vote doesn't restrict the right of the maintainer to adjust the
> behaviour as he considers appropriate.
Anthony Towns writes ("Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)"):
> This bug hasn't been reassigned to the committee so we don't have any
> business ruling on it.
?
That seems to be an oversight on the part of the petitioner.
For the record, I agree with ev
* Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071202 23:14]:
> -8<-
>
> (1) The REMAIL option should not be supplanted or supplemented by
> anything in an /etc/default file. The current behaviour of the
> mixmaster init script, to examine /etc/mixmaster/remailer.conf's
> REMAIL option, is c
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:13:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> -8<-
> (1) The REMAIL option should not be supplanted or supplemented by
> anything in an /etc/default file. The current behaviour of the
> mixmaster init script, to examine /etc/mixmaster/remailer.conf's
> REMAIL opt
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:13:38PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (1) The REMAIL option should not be supplanted or supplemented by
> anything in an /etc/default file. The current behaviour of the
> mixmaster init script, to examine /etc/mixmaster/remailer.conf's
> REMAIL option, is c
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 22:13:38 +, Ian Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I hereby call for a vote on the resolution below, which I sent round a
> draft of on Friday and formally proposed yesterday:
-8> -
> (1) The REMAIL option should not be supplanted or supplemented by
> anything in
8 matches
Mail list logo
