On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:37:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:58:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > But in the real world, we have a lot of services that we just want to
> > > start
> > > in runlevel 2 and be able to trust that the network and disk are sorted.
>
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 09:58:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > But in the real world, we have a lot of services that we just want to start
> > in runlevel 2 and be able to trust that the network and disk are sorted.
> > This is the classic guarantee that sysvinit gave us pre-udev, but it's
> >
Steve Langasek wrote:
> So for a concrete example of where I think upstart's model lets us get
> things right at boot that systemd's dependency model does not (or at least,
> this hasn't been done yet in Debian), I'd like to direct your attention to
> /etc/network/if-up.d/upstart . Conceptually, t
Colin Watson wrote:
> (Now, I've been working with Upstart's model for years, and it's now a
> pretty fundamental way of how I think of system operation; so if people
> who are new to *both* models rather than partisans of one side or the
> other consistently tell me that the systemd model is easie
4 matches
Mail list logo
