Re: Policy Process and Rough Consensus

2015-03-31 Thread Sam Hartman
hi, thanks for an excellent mail. I've read it and agree with your analysis. To the best of my understanding you were elaborating on what I wrote, not disagreeing with it. --Sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Re: Policy Process and Rough Consensus

2015-03-31 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:40:00AM +, Sam Hartman wrote: > Steve, in one of the TC meetings last year, you made the claim that the > policy process was not a rough consensus process. I believe this was: keithp: our policy process isn't based on "rough consensus", but on a stricter d

Policy Process and Rough Consensus

2015-03-30 Thread Sam Hartman
Steve, in one of the TC meetings last year, you made the claim that the policy process was not a rough consensus process. I recently read process.txt.gz from the debian-policy package. That document (admittedly dated after #741573 was submitted) claims the opposite. I don't know what the docu