Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Michael Gilbert writes:
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
So all deferring for another cycle does is leave Debian with annoying
cumbersome init scripts and unsolvable race condition
Users "votes" so far are;- (out of a pop. of~ 151,000)
systemd9473
upstart64
openrc5
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=systemd
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=upstart
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=openrc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-r
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Michael Gilbert writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>> So all deferring for another cycle does is leave Debian with annoying
>>> cumbersome init scripts and unsolvable race conditions for another cycle.
>>
>> Whic
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> So all deferring for another cycle does is leave Debian with annoying
>> cumbersome init scripts and unsolvable race conditions for another cycle.
>
> Which have already been solved for a long time now.
No, they ha
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On 03/02/2014 14:17, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Hence those TC members that don't want to see its default should be
>> trying to figure out how to get 1 of the 4 to vote something else
>> above systemd.
>
> Shouldn't the TC members focus on t
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So all deferring for another cycle does is leave Debian with annoying
> cumbersome init scripts and unsolvable race conditions for another cycle.
Which have already been solved for a long time now. It's not like a
bunch of new sysvinit bugs
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:17:33AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Finally, it is worth considering that there is very little chance for
> upstart to win this particular vote. Given the 4:4 systemd:upstart
> split and existing statements from the 4 on the systemd side, there is
> very little chanc
Jonathan Dowland writes ("Bug#727708: Vote sysvinit 4 jessie"):
> On 03/02/2014 14:17, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Hence those TC members that don't want to see its default should be
> > trying to figure out how to get 1 of the 4 to vote something else
> >
On 03/02/2014 14:17, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hence those TC members that don't want to see its default should be
> trying to figure out how to get 1 of the 4 to vote something else
> above systemd.
Shouldn't the TC members focus on their own vote and leave the others
to focus on theirs? Likewise,
I'd like to make one last plea in support of sysvinit, since I see no
compelling reason to rush to something else in time for jessie.
Firstly, it is already much easier to use alternative init systems
since the TC discussion really got going in December. init-select
makes it super easy to swap be
10 matches
Mail list logo
