Russ Allbery wrote:
> It's conceptually similar, but since kernels are tied directly to a
> Debian architecture, it's easier to handle the kernel case using our
> existing infrastructure. There just isn't a binary package for that
> architecture if it doesn't work with that kernel, and most of the
Bill Myers writes:
> I think the issue of whether packages can depend on a specific init to
> be pid 1 is essentially identical to whether packages can depend on a
> specific kernel (Linux vs FreeBSD vs Hurd) to be running.
> I'm not sure what the exact Debian policy is for that, but just copyin
I think the issue of whether packages can depend on a specific init to be pid 1
is essentially identical to whether packages can depend on a specific kernel
(Linux vs FreeBSD vs Hurd) to be running.
I'm not sure what the exact Debian policy is for that, but just copying that
seems to me the mos
3 matches
Mail list logo
