On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:21:48AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Since all the committee get all the mails anyway automatically, I
> don't think forged messages are likely to be a problem - you'd spot
> them because you'd get them.
That's relevant.
> But, if you still want signatures, Guy could c
Raul Miller writes ("Re: Beefing up the Technical Committee"):
> I'm concerned about you not being able to sign messages for a month.
>
> I can either toss the signature requirement on ballots, have you abstain
> until you get things set up, consider the fact that you&
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:16:41AM -0500, Guy Maor wrote:
> Hi all, I would still like to participate in the tech committee. Also I
> vote yes to recommend Bdale as a new member. I can't sign this message
> because my personal machine is in storage. (I've changed jobs and am
> temporarily living
Hi all, I would still like to participate in the tech committee. Also I
vote yes to recommend Bdale as a new member. I can't sign this message
because my personal machine is in storage. (I've changed jobs and am
temporarily living in Sunnyvale for a month before moving back to Austin.)
Guy
Ben Collins writes ("Beefing up the Technical Committee"):
> I'd like to see the Technical Committee play a more active role in the
> project. I'm looking to call on the committee for various reasons within
> the near future.
Excellent, I'm very glad to hear i
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 11:02:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I said:
> > It's true that the committee has been very inactive, but this is
> > largely due to us not having been called on - although we have had had
> > a couple of ideas to make ourselves more visible, and it is perhaps
> > a failur
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:37:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> > Even without this, I would like to get the count up to the max of 8
> > in the committee. I ask that members who plan to stay active and
> > remain, recommend possible members to me so I can appoint them. One
> > that I ask as a po
I said:
> It's true that the committee has been very inactive, but this is
> largely due to us not having been called on - although we have had had
> a couple of ideas to make ourselves more visible, and it is perhaps
> a failure on our part to get some of those done.
Wichert suggested that we cou
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 03:57:21PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I'd like to see the Technical Committee play a more active role in the
> project. I'm looking to call on the committee for various reasons within
> the near future.
That is one of the things the Committee was originally Set up for.
>
I'd like to see the Technical Committee play a more active role in the
project. I'm looking to call on the committee for various reasons within
the near future. According to the organization page, there are currently
6 members, listed here:
chairman Raul Miller
member Ian J
10 matches
Mail list logo
