Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: A comment about RFC 3484 address selection]

2007-09-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > Currently your message has to be signed with a key that is in the > debian keyring, or you have to be a subscriber. Pierre Habouzit said his comment to the bug didn't reach the list despite being sent via debbugs and being signed:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: A comment about RFC 3484 address selection]

2007-09-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, September 25, 2007 03:21, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >>> FWIW, I believe non-subscriber posts are accepted to the list if > >>> they're sent by way of the BTS. > > > > As far as I know, if you're not subscribed you should sign your message. > > Just

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: A comment about RFC 3484 address selection]

2007-09-24 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tue, September 25, 2007 03:21, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>> FWIW, I believe non-subscriber posts are accepted to the list if >>> they're sent by way of the BTS. > > As far as I know, if you're not subscribed you should sign your message. Just for clarity: this is not the case although the committee w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: A comment about RFC 3484 address selection]

2007-09-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:48:06 +0200 > From: Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: A comment about RFC 3484 address selection > > > FWIW, I believe non-subscriber posts are accepted

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: A comment about RFC 3484 address selection]

2007-09-24 Thread Clint Adams
Per request of author. - Forwarded message from Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:48:06 +0200 From: Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: A comment