> "Don" == Don Armstrong writes:
Don> OK. So assuming this is the case, does option B in the draft
Don> now represent your view? Or is option A sufficient?
Assuming that the discussion plays out as I suspect, I'd probably vote
a=b>z>c
If it's clear from the log that we thought about
> "Lisandro" == Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> writes:
Lisandro> Hi Sam! A long time has passed since then and I should re
Lisandro> read the full and extensive bug log to assert whatever you
Lisandro> want to ask. But I can be sure on one thing: at the time
Lisand
Sam Hartman writes:
> You are copied on this message because you raised objections noted by
> the policy editors during the discussion of menu policy or seconded the
> proposal in #707851. The TC is currently evaluating a request to review
> that proposal and the process surrounding it.
> If yo
Hi Sam! A long time has passed since then and I should re read the full and
extensive bug log to assert whatever you want to ask. But I can be sure on one
thing: at the time of issuing seconds, to the best of my knowledge, there
where no counter-seconds. So I would say the process was followed,
The next CTTE meeting is at date -d 'Jun 24 2015 17:00:00 UTC' in
#debian-ctte on irc.debian.org.
The agenda is in git as usual; please update the agenda if there are
additional items you would like discussed.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
a friend will help
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I hope I've been more clear in my communication about the menu policy
> bug. I'd really like to see us call for any objections to the proposal
> on debian-policy and amongst ourselves prior to voting.
Right; I expect anyone who has objections to Charles or
Hi, folks.
I will be at an event in maryland that starts just around the time of
the meeting so I'll be unable to attend.
I hope I've been more clear in my communication about the menu policy
bug. I'd really like to see us call for any objections to the proposal
on debian-policy and amongst ourse
You are copied on this message because you raised objections noted by
the policy editors during the discussion of menu policy or seconded the
proposal in #707851.
The TC is currently evaluating a request to review that proposal and the
process surrounding it.
If you seconded the proposal, I'd lik
8 matches
Mail list logo
