Mehdi DOGGUY writes:
> Le 31 mars 2015 02:49, bjf...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>> After explaining we have an impressive ratio of female to male
>> participants in the Debian project as a whole (not just technical),
>> your suggestion is to get more women involved generally with Debian
>> (still not
Having reviewed the policy team's process.txt document and having
reviewed Charles's comments, I'm much less sanguine when I think about
the approach for resolving the menu system discussion that we discussed
last Thursday.
Keith may well have an approach that improves over both the status quo
hi, thanks for an excellent mail.
I've read it and agree with your analysis. To the best of my
understanding you were elaborating on what I wrote, not disagreeing with
it.
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:40:00AM +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Steve, in one of the TC meetings last year, you made the claim that the
> policy process was not a rough consensus process.
I believe this was:
keithp: our policy process isn't based on "rough
consensus", but on a stricter d
[I think that what follows is entirely redundant with what I wrote earlier.]
Le Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:32:58PM -0400, Sam Hartman a écrit :
>
> Steve claimed that the policy process is not a rough consensus process
> and that the fact that Bill objected in-and-of-itself might be
> sufficient t
5 matches
Mail list logo
