+++ Don Armstrong [2014-11-19 16:41 -0800]:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > I have to admit that the code is not exactly lightweight. I do
> > understand the desire to get rid it and asked that a ctte ruling does
> > not apply beyond jessie for that reason.
>
> Are people who are d
+++ Ben Longbons [2014-11-19 22:18 -0800]:
> If the cross tools miss jessie and go in jessie-backports, that will
> require a significant amount of knowledge and discipline on the part
> of all the package maintainers involved, to make sure that they always
> have matching versions despite being i
Friends, Debianites, developers, lend me your ears;
I come to bury Ian, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Ian. The noble Bdale
Hath told you Ian was ambitious:
If it were so, it was a grievous fault;
And grievously
Don Armstrong writes:
> I think we should give people a bit more time to come up with options,
> but if no one is even moving by our IRC meeting on December 4th, then
> something along these lines seems reasonable to me.
I agree.
Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 11/20/2014 06:27 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> >> Does this include the "no change is required" option?
> >
> > I don't think we have such an option even proposed. [Or even, any
> > options.] I'd probab
Hi,
[ Replying to the bug. ]
On 11/20/2014 06:27 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Don Armstrong writes:
>>> Speaking personally, without specific patches which have been discussed
>>> with the maintainers of the init package and well tested, I'm unlikely
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > Speaking personally, without specific patches which have been discussed
> > with the maintainers of the init package and well tested, I'm unlikely
> > to vote any resolution on this issue above FD.
>
> Does this include the
Hi.
Thanks for your hard work.
Over the past years you've put in a lot of work in the TC.
I think you were one of the forces that really pushed the TC to be a
viable decision making body.
You seemed to really care that when issues were brought to the TC, they
were considered and a decision made.
Hi,
Don Armstrong writes:
> Speaking personally, without specific patches which have been discussed
> with the maintainers of the init package and well tested, I'm unlikely
> to vote any resolution on this issue above FD.
Does this include the "no change is required" option? I would prefer if
we
9 matches
Mail list logo
