On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 04:07:17PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> [EOD from me due to a lack of time, but that needed to be said]
And thank you for saying it.
--
http://www.cafepress.com/trunktees -- geeky funny T-shirts
http://gtdfh.branchable.com/ -- GTD for hackers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:07:16PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> All distributions "care" about not having security issues in their code, but
> that's not the same thing as actually doing the work to audit the code. In
> practice this only happens when dedicated resources are turned on the code
>
Hi Ian,
Ian Jackson writes:
> My point was that someone who is writing an init system for concurrent
> startup and dynamic service management needs to have a good
> understanding of concurrent system design, and in particular of race
> hazards. I wouldn't expect a person or people who had such a
Le vendredi 29 novembre 2013 à 17:55 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Indeed, systemd has not been written with security in mind.
Obviously, such a subjective judgment of valor does not mean the same to
me as to other developers. It is easy to quote it out of context and say
“oh, look! some sy
4 matches
Mail list logo
