Just a reminder that the next CTTE IRC meeting is at:
date -d 'August 30 2012 17:00 UTC'
on #debian-ctte on irc.debian.org.
The current agenda is located here:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/debian-ctte.git;a=blob_plain;f=meetings/agenda.txt;hb=HEAD
please update and/or add agend
Ian Jackson writes:
> While I was there I noticed some infelicities, so I have
Thanks, Ian!
Bdale
pgpBmebVkDDOt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
While I was there I noticed some infelicities, so I have:
* Added a link to the tech-ctte's git repo
* Removed the empty "recommendations and advice issued" section and
folded it into "technical decisions", since many of our recent
resolutions contain a mixture of decisions we were empow
I wrote:
> Now that we are dealing with a number of issues simultaneously, and
> all getting a number of copies of lots of messages, I think we need to
> think about our workflow a bit better.
> 1. The first time an issue is referred to the TC, a new bug will be
>created which is filed against
Cord Beermann writes ("Re: Mail-followup-to on debian-ctte@lists.debian.org"):
> ok, i need to redo my grep 101. It was indeed the list-software which
> sets the mail-followup-to-Header.
Heh.
> Sadly there isn'T a comment why that config has been added, but i
> disabled it for now.
Thanks, that
Hallo! Du (Ian Jackson) hast geschrieben:
> Cord Beermann writes ("Re: Mail-followup-to on debian-ctte@lists.debian.org"):
> > So let me sum up what i understand so far:
>
> Thanks for your reply. You've not quite understood. A better summary
> is that messages to debian-ctte@lists always get a
Cord Beermann writes ("Re: Mail-followup-to on debian-ctte@lists.debian.org"):
> So let me sum up what i understand so far:
Thanks for your reply. You've not quite understood. A better summary
is that messages to debian-ctte@lists always get a Mail-Followup-To
header, which is sometimes unwanted
Hallo! Du (Ian Jackson) hast geschrieben:
> On the 7th of August I wrote:
> > When we send mail to a bug assigned to tech-ctte, we end up with
> > something like this being delivered to the list's subscribers:
> ...
> > We would like the mail-followup-to to either not be there at all, or
> > to po
On the 7th of August I wrote:
> When we send mail to a bug assigned to tech-ctte, we end up with
> something like this being delivered to the list's subscribers:
...
> We would like the mail-followup-to to either not be there at all, or
> to point to the bug report. In the case of bugs assigned to
9 matches
Mail list logo
