Ian Jackson writes:
> Gerrit Pape writes ("Re: Bug#422139: Please supply a sysvinit script"):
>> A separate binary package named git-daemon-sysv or so, that conflicts
>> and provides git-daemon-run, is the way I'd do the integration.
> Personally I think the profusion of tiny packages is not all
Gerrit Pape writes ("Re: Bug#422139: Please supply a sysvinit script"):
> Yes, sure. If there's an init script that's well integrated into the
> git packages contributed, I have no problem to apply the patch to the
> git-core packages. As I'm not that motivated, and sometimes also short
> on time
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 08:34:45AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>
> A separate binary package named git-daemon-sysv or so, that conflicts
> and provides git-daemon-run, is the way I'd do the integration.
Why should it provide git-daemon-run?
In my experience, having the init script in a different b
Hi, Russ summarized my opinion very well.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:13:17PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Were this my package, I think what I'd do is offer an init script that
> automatically switches to using runit if git-daemon-run is installed,
> detecting that in some reasonable fashion. I c
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:38:11AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert writes ("Bug#510415: tech-ctte: Qmail inclusion (or not) in
> Debian"):
> > Criteria that speak against inclusion:
> > - no real upstream
> What is required is that _someone_ is able and prepared to act as
> upstream. I
5 matches
Mail list logo
