* Ian Jackson (i...@davenant.greenend.org.uk) [090113 01:58]:
> Andreas and Raul: are you subscribed some other way ? If you are then
> I can discontinue this alias. If you would like to continue to be
> subscribed via chiark then that's fine by me.
I'm unsubscribeable subscribed to the normal l
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Technical committee workflow"):
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Here's a first draft of the procedural resolution. Sorry it's so long
> > but I couldn't see how to make it shorter.
>
> It looks mostly fine. Two remarks however:
>
> - the explicit queue
Anthony Towns writes ("chiark -ctte copies"):
> I'm still getting duplicates of the -ctte lists via:
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: chiark -ctte copies"):
> I think this was something Ian set up to make sure the TC members were never
> unsubscribed from the list accidentally? Which has never happene
Steve Langasek writes ("Confirmation vote for Russ Allbery"):
> While both Russ and Don have enjoyed the support of the Technical Committee
> in private discussions and I don't see a confirmation vote for them being
> anything more than a formality, under 6.3.4 of the constitution it is a
> formali
Steve Langasek writes ("Confirmation vote for Don Armstrong"):
> While both Russ and Don have enjoyed the support of the Technical Committee
> in private discussions and I don't see a confirmation vote for them being
> anything more than a formality, under 6.3.4 of the constitution it is a
> formal
* Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [090112 18:39]:
> And Steve organised the vote to add Russ (which got approved),
> and propose Don to the DPL.
>
> Andreas said that with 3 of the 5 votes for proposing Don the vote
> is over. But I think it's only 3 of 6 at that point, and the DPL
> still needs to
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:50:02PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:57:31AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
>>
>> It gives me great pleasure to welcome Russ Allbery and Don
>> Armstrong as the newest members of the Technical Committee.
>
>If I understand things right, you can add
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:50 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> If I understand things right, you can add new members until
> the number reaches 6 and can then proposed new members to the
> DPL.
Since my invitations to the new members were issued after unanimous
agreement by the existing members of the t
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:57:31AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Anthony Towns recently announced his decision to step down from
> the Debian Technical Committee:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2009/01/msg6.html
>
> I thank him on behalf of the rest of the committee and the
> proj
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Whoever takes the decision, we still need an agreed upon definition of
> > crap, otherwise people will be unhappy to not be able to maintain the
> > piece of software they care about. Even if that software is crap.
>
> Do the definitions of "grave" an
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:35:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > There are three possibilities here:
> > 1) The ftp team have a duty to judge whether a NEW package is too buggy to
> > be
> >allowed into the archive.
> > 2) The ftp team may exclude NEW packages from the archive that they b
11 matches
Mail list logo
