I think that we should implement versioned symbols. If you have not
already done so please look at the log for bug#136707. I believe my
writeup in that bug log of how versioned symbols interact with symbol
resolution and under what circumstances it will cause ABI
compatibility issues with other d
On Fri, 07 Mar 2003, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Someone was recently talking on the LSB list about the problem, and his
> proposed solution to to update ld.so to support what sounded like a
> resolution scope, ie libldap would require libpngx i
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> As an example: for SASL (which currently causes breakage encompassing LDAP
> (and through it, glibc nss modules), we would have to force-feed upstream a
> SASL2 enabled source of postfix and sendmail, for example. We would also
> have to dr
3 matches
Mail list logo
