you got to be kidding me... gezz
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> On the other hand, I feel this committee needs concrete proposals to
Raul> discuss. If we don't have anything concrete: accepting, rejecting and
Raul> modifying nonexistant proposals is rather difficult.
If we can get a definit
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the
vote)"):
> Duh. You really do not need to vote just to decide nothing. :-/
> I'm the submitter of the bug, I'm closing it. Problem closed.
Thanks. That obviates the need for the vote, I think.
Ian.
Raul Miller writes ("Re: Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the vote)"):
> [Aside: I'm not yet in a position to pgp sign anything.]
That's fine. If you see someone forging your votes, we can phone you
up to check what you really said :-).
Ian.
Your message dated Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:09:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the vote)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:45:36AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Raul> Perhaps we should invite Herbert Xu and/or Gerd Knorr to
> Raul> comment on this subject?
>
> That would be a good start.
Ok. Next question: who poses the questions? [I'll do it if no one
else does: sometime tomo
Le Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:04:11PM -0600, Bdale Garbee écrivait:
> > Therefore it seems to us that there is no longer a need for a
> > decision by the Committee. The bug report will be closed.
>
> I agree.
Duh. You really do not need to vote just to decide nothing. :-/
I'm the submitter of
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 07:24:50PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So, I hereby call for a vote on my earlier proposal to close the bug
> and vote in favour. Here's a copy if you missed it:
>
> The Committee regret that we have failed to get to grips with the
> actual dispute or issue in the ques
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson) writes:
> So, I hereby call for a vote on my earlier proposal to close the bug
> and vote in favour.
> Therefore it seems to us that there is no longer a need for a
> decision by the Committee. The bug report wil
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Colin Walters writes ("Re: Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the
> vote)"):
> On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 19:59, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Therefore it seems to us that there is no longer a need for a
> > decision by the Committee. The bug report will
Colin Walters writes ("Re: Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the vote)"):
> On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 19:59, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Therefore it seems to us that there is no longer a need for a
> > decision by the Committee. The bug report will be closed.
>
> That is correct. Please go ah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raul Miller) writes:
> What do the rest of you think?
It would help to know what evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, Herbert has for
feeling the vesafb stuff doesn't work on some machines. I personally haven't
heard that, but that says nothing.
I'm generally inclined to side w
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Proposal 1: we believe Herbert Xu and agree that vesa support not be
Raul> included in debian kernels.
Raul> Proposal 2: we believe that vesa support is both useful and harmless
Raul> and ask Herbert Xu to include it in debian kernels.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:26:52AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> See below. I claim Herbert Xu to decide not reasonable in this issue,
> working against ?4 of the social contract. Please decide wise and force
> him to change the current situation.
>
> See also
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
THE GATOSON (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our Ref.: 12 main items (GGG-1)23rd Oct. 2002
Dear Sir,
We can get the follow good quality products which made
in China at the SPECIAL LOWEST PRICES.
If you are interested them, kindly contact us by return
e-mail, we wi
See below. I claim Herbert Xu to decide not reasonable in this issue,
working against §4 of the social contract. Please decide wise and force
him to change the current situation.
See also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=161931&repeatmerged=yes
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
16 matches
Mail list logo
