>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> Looking at the situation, I think that the definition of `serious' bug
Ian> report is rather unhelpful and does not match up with the use of
Ian> `must' or `required' in policy.
Incidentally, I think the serious severity was inve
It's not clear to me why tech-ctte discussions seem to not get cc'ed to
the appropriate bug number properly. See also the discussion for the
pcmcia-cs bug, much of which happened on the list rather than in the
bug report.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 01:34:26AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> But, the idea
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?"):
>> From reviewing the bug report, Ian Jackson sided with the
>> maintainer, with the opinion that not all binaries shipped with a
>> package need work when the dep
>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ian> Looking at the situation, I think that the definition of
Ian> `serious' bug report is rather unhelpful and does not match up
Ian> with the use of `must' or `required' in policy.
What makes you say that? Serious is defined as a vi
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Eh ? I thought we'd unmoderated the list.
mmm, in that case you are probably looking at old spam that pre-dates
the spamassasin setup. I haven't got any on the ctte list since then..
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Jason Gunthorpe writes ("Re: Can we reject HTML mail ?"):
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Is there any software on lists.debian.org that could bounce all HTML
> > mail sent to debian-ctte ? debian-ctte is getting a hideous amount of
> > spam. It's clogging our mailboxes and making t
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 01:34:26AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Currently it says:
>
> serious
> is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it violates a
> "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package
> maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for
Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Processed: yawn"):
> reassign 97671 tech-ctte,xutils
> thanks
>
> Anthony has offered no basis for his latest manipulation of my bug list
> aside from the derisive remark in the Subject:.
>
> I am requesting the Technical Committee's resolution of this dispute
> under
I propose to put the following stuff on our web page:
(in no particular order)
* List of members and name of the chairman
* Link to the constitution
* Link to the debian-ctte archives
* Link to the BTS page
* Instructions for how to contact the committee
* What to expect when you contact the comm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Is there any software on lists.debian.org that could bounce all HTML
> mail sent to debian-ctte ? debian-ctte is getting a hideous amount of
> spam. It's clogging our mailboxes and making the archives unuseable.
Hmm. It seems I'm not getting unmoderate
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?"):
> From reviewing the bug report, Ian Jackson sided with the
> maintainer, with the opinion that not all binaries shipped with a
> package need work when the dependencies are satisfied. Dale Scheetz,
> Jason Guntho
Previously Ian Jackson wrote:
> Is there any software on lists.debian.org that could bounce all HTML
> mail sent to debian-ctte ? debian-ctte is getting a hideous amount of
> spam.
stick this in the procmailrc filters on murphy:
:0
* ^Content-Type: *text/html.*
/dev/null
--
_
Branden Robinson writes ("Technical Committee: decision on #119517?"):
> Over six months ago, on 2001-11-14, Bug #119517 was submitted to the
> Technical Committee for a ruling. No member of the Technical Committe
> has participated in any public discussion of this bug (at least in the
> bug logs
Is there any software on lists.debian.org that could bounce all HTML
mail sent to debian-ctte ? debian-ctte is getting a hideous amount of
spam. It's clogging our mailboxes and making the archives unuseable.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Firstly, I'd like to apologise to everyone here for not stepping up to
the job of Chairman as quickly as I ought to done. From now on I'm
rearranging my schedule to ensure that I'll read and deal with
tech-ctte mail at least twice a week, which should prove a useful
response time.
So, having said
15 matches
Mail list logo
