Updates of the cdimage.d.o webpages

hi, i just looked at cdimage.d.o about the _CDa images if there is a statement on this but couldn't find any. it just says that 2.2_rev0 are the official ones, so the _CDa aren't (if a new user reads that). afaik is _CDa also an official image. maybe one should update the pages on these kind of i

where to rsync from

hi, who is offering the cdimages via rsync because cdimage.debian.org is so slow that i will wait weeks till everything is mirrored. so, any hints for a poor mirror maintainer? so long othmar PS: ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: out of date info on http://cdimage.debian.org/ch32.html

hi, On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:25:50PM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > Quite so. Thanks for mentioning, I'd forgotten all about it ;-) > And while I was on it, I also copied the debian.org style to the cdimage > pages. Had been on my non-urgent-TODO list for years. btw. is the web content also mirr

need cd mirror

hi, well, since phil hands' cdimage mirror is too fast (would be too expensive) i am looking for one who also mirrors the cdimages and which ideally _does_not_ route through carrier1 to me. i.e. abovenet and ebone/gts would be great. thanks and so long Othmar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: Are PIK mirrors obsolete?

Hi folks, On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 12:54:24PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > The important thing first: jigdo-mirror needs more testers! When 3.0r0 > is released, cdimage will be so overloaded that any rsync-based > mirroring will be very slow, so set up jigdo-mirror instead! well, if you want m

Re: Are PIK mirrors obsolete?

Hi, On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > well, if you want mirror maintainers to be actually aware of > jigdo, joy or whoever should mail the mirror maintainer list. i > think it's somewhat closed, or whatever, you probably have to > speak to joy (