hello,
about the unofficial CD images from Sarge/testing on
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/
they are bootable, but the installation is not correct.
CD1 contains an old or other installation than the latest 02012004 (??)
and CD2 is bootable with the 02012004 installation, howev
Hello,
about the unofficial CD images from Sarge/testing on
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/
I wonder why does people still use the ftp.fsn.hu testing images instead of
the official ones, I mean, they were of a big help for people upgrading to
testing in the past, but now tha
hello,
a couple of Debian CD images questions
1. When can we expect new cd-images on
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/cd/jigdo-area/
The current version is 10 days old :)
2. What about 700 Mbyte images (instead of 650 MByte), maybe not full
images on the mirror/rsync but just the jigd
Hello,
the new sarge jigo images contains dvd images instead of cd images...
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/cd/jigdo-area/i386/
is the same as:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/dvd/jigdo-area/i386/
Alfred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
hello,
about the unofficial CD images from Sarge/testing on
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/
they are bootable, but the installation is not correct.
CD1 contains an old or other installation than the latest 02012004 (??)
and CD2 is bootable with the 02012004 installation, howeve
Hello,
about the unofficial CD images from Sarge/testing on
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/
I wonder why does people still use the ftp.fsn.hu testing images instead of
the official ones, I mean, they were of a big help for people upgrading to
testing in the past, but now that
6 matches
Mail list logo