Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey folks, On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:36:47PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:33:15PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >>Hi, >> >>It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point >>release. >> >>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preference

Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi Steve, On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for > the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for > then. > > We've been hard at work testing and fixing things for the last couple > of w

Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:24:45PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi Steve, > >On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for >> the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for >> then. >> >> We've

Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:07:59PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:24:45PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: >>Hi Steve, >> >>On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for >>> the point release, b

Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as > already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with > basically *just* the shim/SB changes? I'm OK to go with that option if > that's our pre

Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:18:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as >> already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with >> basically *just* th