Bug#865470: [Debian-ports-devel] Bug#865470: include debian-ports-archive-keyring on non released architectures

2017-06-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:20:59AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >I'm not sure I understand why you added the additional "sort -u" here. Is > >the order > >of packages important? Did you get an error when building a CD without it? > > Reproducible builds effort, probably? Hmm, that's possible.

Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) 15/16 July 22/23 July [SRMs: needs one of you too please :) ] Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.or

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:10:04PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these >suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > >8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Impossible for me, I'm busy all weekend. >15/16 July >22/23 July Both

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

2017-06-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-06-25): > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of > these suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? > > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) > 15/16 July > 22/23 July I should be equally busy on all weeks leading to these week-ends, so no prefer