Re: Towards d-i wheezy beta 3

2012-09-10 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hello, > > tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the > prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and > explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me. > > That's why I'm goi

Re: Towards d-i wheezy beta 3

2012-09-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:38:38PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > I'd like to see it recommend the instalation of (or just install by default) > system processor microcode update packages when non-free is enabled on a x86 > arch (i386 or amd64) and the running processor is either Intel

Re: Towards d-i wheezy beta 3

2012-09-10 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:38:38PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > I'd like to see it recommend the instalation of (or just install by default) > > system processor microcode update packages when non-free is enabled on a x86 > > arch (i386 or

Re: Towards d-i wheezy beta 3

2012-09-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 21:10 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:38:38PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > I'd like to see it recommend the instalation of (or just install by default) > > system processor microcode update packages when non-free is enabled on a x86 > >