Processing of debian-cd_3.1.1_i386.changes

2009-02-12 Thread Archive Administrator
debian-cd_3.1.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-cd_3.1.1.dsc debian-cd_3.1.1.tar.gz debian-cd_3.1.1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

debian-cd_3.1.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-02-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: debian-cd_3.1.1.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-cd/debian-cd_3.1.1.dsc debian-cd_3.1.1.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-cd/debian-cd_3.1.1.tar.gz debian-cd_3.1.1_all.deb to pool/main/d/debian-cd/debian-cd_3.1.1_all.deb Override entries for your package: debian-cd_3.1.1.dsc - source admin d

Bug#513498: marked as done (which_deb: i386 is hardcoded in several places, fails on amd64)

2009-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:02:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#513498: fixed in debian-cd 3.1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #513498, regarding which_deb: i386 is hardcoded in several places, fails on amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#513421: marked as done (debian-cd: DISC_PKG_HOOK is ignored)

2009-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:02:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#513421: fixed in debian-cd 3.1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #513421, regarding debian-cd: DISC_PKG_HOOK is ignored to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#514237: marked as done (debian-cd: Support non-i386 mirrors, and support D-I modules in non-main)

2009-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:02:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#514237: fixed in debian-cd 3.1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #514237, regarding debian-cd: Support non-i386 mirrors, and support D-I modules in non-main to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#513497: marked as done (update-tasks: assumes i386, fails for other architectures)

2009-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:02:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#513497: fixed in debian-cd 3.1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #513497, regarding update-tasks: assumes i386, fails for other architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

debian base cd

2009-02-12 Thread Daniel Hoggan
is there any possible way for me to get a hold of a debian base cd, does it include X, if so how would I go about removing X and installing DirectFB Free Email Account by ZenSearch.com http://email.ZenSearch.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

CD/DVD image names

2009-02-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
As promised to various people, just a quick heads-up of the likely image names and layout for the lenny build at the weekend. I've been doing test runs today and the names should be very like the following (i386-only, but I'm sure you can extrapolate). For the base directory for these when I build

Why two copies of CONF.sh?

2009-02-12 Thread Jonathan Hall
As I was reviewing the diff between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1, I noticed that CONF.sh shows up twice in my diff, which begs the (trivial) question: Why are we shipping two identical files in the source package? :) ab7b76c3b77f9d2ef12c7254e0f0f1f7 CONF.sh ab7b76c3b77f9d2ef12c7254e0f0f1f7 debian/CONF.s

Re: Why two copies of CONF.sh?

2009-02-12 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:31:58AM -0600, Jonathan Hall wrote: > As I was reviewing the diff between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1, I noticed that > CONF.sh shows up twice in my diff, which begs the (trivial) question: > Why are we shipping two identical files in the source package? :) > > ab7b76c3b77f9d2e