Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

Hi Dann, On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:38:31AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: >On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >> There are still things to decide, and IMO consensus on this should be >> reached soon! >> - The naming of the etch+1/2 kernel meta packages is now suddenly essenti

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 CD images (was: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection)

On Monday 04 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > The required patches for the installer are attached. I have successfully > tested them using a custom built netinst CD that had both the 2.6.18 and > 2.6.22-686 kernels on it. The needed changes to D-I have now all been uploaded. > - There has as yet

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things: > 1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta' >template > 2) add an partman init.d hook script that changes the default >inode_size from 256 to

Re: D-I Etch+1/2 kernel selection (was: Beta1 missing decisions and possible timeline)

On Tuesday 05 February 2008, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:53:43AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > Finally I created the etch-support udeb which does two things: > > 1) add an early base-installer hook script that sets the 'altmeta' > >template > > 2) add an partman init.d hook s