Re: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/ states SID for testing.iso

2007-03-08 Thread Frans Pop
Moving this question to debian-cd, where it belongs. Please reply only to debian-cd. On Thursday 08 March 2007 07:52, Jeff Meldrum wrote: > Hi, while I was downloading the net install iso for i386 at > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/i >so-cd/ the web page ti

Bug#413129: marked as done (3.1r5 full-cd broken for powerpc)

2007-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:39:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#413129: debian-31r5-powerpc-binary-1.iso broken

2007-03-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:39:54PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: >Hi Steve, > >On Thursday 08 March 2007 02:07, you wrote: >> Hmmm. I've just successfully booted both of the following: >> >> * 3.1 r0a powerpc CD#1 >> * 3.1 r5 powerpc CD#1 >> >> on a Powerbook G4 that I've managed to borrow. No issu

Re: Multi-arch weekly build failures

2007-03-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:28:28AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >On Thursday 08 March 2007 02:15, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> powerpc and amd64 daily builds are both being problematic atm, which >> is unfortunate. The moment we have a set of working boot files for >> both, I'll build the multi-arch discs.

Bug#413850: generating the splashimage does not work due to wrong path

2007-03-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:14:08AM +1100, Steffen Joeris wrote: >Package: debian-cd >Severity: normal >Tags: patch > >Hi mates > >When I tried to build one of our amd64 daily builds I did not quite get >it working, which was due to an error in the path. Attached you find a >patch which solved the p