On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:41:29AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>Hello,
>
>We updated our patchset for Debian-CD 3.0.0 and thought would be good
>to send all them for review and merging, if possible.
>
>I don't think that any patch here included are too specific to avoid
>merging and if something
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>I don't think that any patch here included are too specific to avoid
>>merging and if something needs to be change to make it possible,
>>please, tell us :-D
>
> I'll take a look. At first glance, nothing seems problematic, but I
> need to make some tim
Does a multi-architecture net-install CD for Debian stable exist
anywhere? Or, if not, are there significant obstacles to creating one?
Even just i386 and PPC on a single disc would be very useful.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:30:57PM -0500, Paul wrote:
>Does a multi-architecture net-install CD for Debian stable exist
>anywhere?
No, sorry. The multi-arch netinst is a very new feature in the last
few months.
>Or, if not, are there significant obstacles to creating one?
>Even just i386 and PP
Right now I'm having a pretty big issue attempting to install etch onto
some intel blades because Debian doesn't' include USB HID support on the
installation CD images. Has anyone created either netinst discs or the
like which will work with a legacy free system?
--
Michael Loftis
Modwest Ope
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:30:57PM -0500, Steve McIntyre wrote:
It should be _possible_ to make one, but you'll need to do a fair
amount of hackery on debian-cd to do so. If you want to try, then use
the scripts under tools/boot/etch to give you an idea of the similar
changes you'll need for s
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:30:57PM -0500, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> It should be _possible_ to make one, but you'll need to do a fair
>> amount of hackery on debian-cd to do so. If you want to try, then
>> use the scripts under tools/boot/etch to give you an ide
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:21AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>While doing the $(BDIR)/rawlist we need to use the DEBOOTSTRAP_SCRIPT
>variable to better support CDDs.
Fine.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:15AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sometimes is useful to use a mirror without the docs and tools
>directory. This patch allow it if we export the ALLOWBROKENMIRROR
>variable on CONF.sh
>diff --git a/tools/make_image b/tool
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:02:26PM -0500, Paul wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:30:57PM -0500, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>>It should be _possible_ to make one, but you'll need to do a fair
>>amount of hackery on debian-cd to do so. If you want to try, then use
>>the scripts under tools/boot/etch
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:37AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hmmm. I'm not convinced by this one, either. It's a major decision to
change dependency ordering, and we expect dependency resolution to
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:01AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>APT uses the dpkg status file and then we should make an empty file if
>it doesn't exists.
>
>Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>---
>
> tools/apt-selection |3 +++
> 1
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:28AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>diff --git a/tools/list2cds b/tools/list2cds
>index 78ec89f..427d814 100755
>--- a/tools/list2cds
>+++ b/tools/list2cds
>@@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ if (not $nonus) {
> }
> }
>
>+open (EXC
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:07AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>tools/start_new_disc doesn't need to check the mirror for consistency
>since it has already been done by the Makefile. Removed this code.
OK, shouldn't *necessarily* be a problem, but wit
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:37AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hmmm. I'm not convinced by this one, either. It's a major decision to
> change depen
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:15AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>Sometimes is useful to use a mirror without the docs and tools
>>directory. This patch allow it if we export the ALLOWBROKENMIRROR
>>variab
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:07AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>tools/start_new_disc doesn't need to check the mirror for consistency
>>since it has already been done by the Makefile. Removed this code.
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:45:28AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>From: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>diff --git a/tools/list2cds b/tools/list2cds
>>index 78ec89f..427d814 100755
>>--- a/tools/list2cds
>>+++ b/tools/list2cds
>>@@ -107,6 +107
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm. I'm curious why you need this - the Makefile code in the
> $(ADIR)/status: target should be making the status file as needed,
> surely?
Yes, it does.
I use this to use apt-selection to write down a task for me, using a
meta-package as origin. Do
19 matches
Mail list logo
