Umm, seems like we go again for the same discusion, ok, I've been gathering
some old links to try to shorten this.
The isolinux / multiboot / boot floppy emulation (syslinux) decision was
already discussed for woody, at that time I was building unofficial images
for all woody's arches, and I also
Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umm, seems like we go again for the same discusion, ok, I've been gathering
> some old links to try to shorten this.
>
> The isolinux / multiboot / boot floppy emulation (syslinux) decision was
> already discussed for woody, at that time I wa
Umm, seems like we go again for the same discusion, ok, I've been gathering
some old links to try to shorten this.
The isolinux / multiboot / boot floppy emulation (syslinux) decision was
already discussed for woody, at that time I was building unofficial images
for all woody's arches, and I also
Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umm, seems like we go again for the same discusion, ok, I've been gathering
> some old links to try to shorten this.
>
> The isolinux / multiboot / boot floppy emulation (syslinux) decision was
> already discussed for woody, at that time I wa
4 matches
Mail list logo