* jason andrade
| On 20 Dec 2002, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > Why not both?
|
| frankly i don't see the point in the proliferation of different ISO formats
| from a mirror point of view. i'd prefer to see official debian cd images as:
|
| o a single "lightweight" netinst iso per architecture
Repository: debian-cd/tools
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 04:42:55 MST 2002
Log Message:
Added modified version of dpkg-scanpackages that can be told to only
take one architecture. Needed for the new version of update-cd.
Files:
added: my-dpkg-scanpackages
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Repository: debian-cd/tools
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 05:07:59 MST 2002
Log Message:
Updated to work with new update-cd and local my-dpkg-scanpackages script
Files:
added: scanpackages.old
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Repository: debian-cd
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 05:13:08 MST 2002
Log Message:
Updated to make woody update CDs. We fit onto two CDs for now:
CD1: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k src all
CD2: mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc src all
Fairly big changes to cope with pools, especial
Repository: debian-cd
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 05:34:10 MST 2002
Log Message:
Make sure we're in the right directory before running scansources
Files:
changed:update-cd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
> | First of all, what do we want to build, the smaller ones 45 Mb right now,
> | or the installable from cd ones, 83 Mb.
>
> Why not both?
It's ok with me, we only need good names for them so that people know what
to download ;-)
> This could be fixed by having packages not using the normal
> s
Hi,
I recently noticed, that the jigdo directory in
http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/current/
is not yet redirected to jigdo-area/3.0_r1/
Until now, this seems to be true on the following servers:
http://cdimage.debian.org
http://us.cdimage.debian.org
http://.non-us.cdimage.debian.org
Regar
I've got (what I believe to be) functional update images generated on
open now. I'm not sure exactly what needs to be done to make them
available via jigdo yet - Phil, can I ask you to take a look at that
for me? The ISOs are in /home/stevem/wood-update at the moment.
I've generated these using an
Ok, the following source packages now use the srcpackage_cvs facility
at packages.qa.debian.org:
debian-installer (virtual for all the stuff under debian-installer)
boot-floppies
tasksel
debian-cd
base-config
mklibs
modconf
fai
This lets users subscribe to CVS messages as they de
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:55:57PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > | First of all, what do we want to build, the smaller ones 45 Mb
> > right now, | or the installable from cd ones, 83 Mb.
> >
> > Why not both?
>
> It's ok with me, we only need good names for them so that people
> know
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi Steve,
> CD1: src all alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
> CD2: src all mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
one query - is there any reason to generate this as two ISO images
rather than an upgrade ISO for each architecture which can then be
dropped into the e
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 10:58:19AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
>
>On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>> CD1: src all alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
>> CD2: src all mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
>
>one query - is there any reason to generate this as two ISO images
>rather than
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> None, really - I just tried to fit them into a small number of CDs
> similar to the potato ones. It would be simple to generate separate
> CDs (11) for each arch if people would prefer that...?
my $0.02 is that it would be better to have a smaller ISO
quero que todo mundo se foda neste natal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* jason andrade
| On 20 Dec 2002, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > Why not both?
|
| frankly i don't see the point in the proliferation of different ISO formats
| from a mirror point of view. i'd prefer to see official debian cd images as:
|
| o a single "lightweight" netinst iso per architecture
Repository: debian-cd/tools
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 04:42:55 MST 2002
Log Message:
Added modified version of dpkg-scanpackages that can be told to only
take one architecture. Needed for the new version of update-cd.
Files:
added: my-dpkg-scanpackages
Repository: debian-cd/tools
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 05:07:59 MST 2002
Log Message:
Updated to work with new update-cd and local my-dpkg-scanpackages script
Files:
added: scanpackages.old
Repository: debian-cd
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 05:13:08 MST 2002
Log Message:
Updated to make woody update CDs. We fit onto two CDs for now:
CD1: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k src all
CD2: mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc src all
Fairly big changes to cope with pools, especial
Repository: debian-cd
who:93sam
time: Sat Dec 21 05:34:10 MST 2002
Log Message:
Make sure we're in the right directory before running scansources
Files:
changed:update-cd
> | First of all, what do we want to build, the smaller ones 45 Mb right now,
> | or the installable from cd ones, 83 Mb.
>
> Why not both?
It's ok with me, we only need good names for them so that people know what
to download ;-)
> This could be fixed by having packages not using the normal
> s
Hi,
I recently noticed, that the jigdo directory in
http://cdimage.debian.org/jigdo-area/current/
is not yet redirected to jigdo-area/3.0_r1/
Until now, this seems to be true on the following servers:
http://cdimage.debian.org
http://us.cdimage.debian.org
http://.non-us.cdimage.debian.org
Regar
I've got (what I believe to be) functional update images generated on
open now. I'm not sure exactly what needs to be done to make them
available via jigdo yet - Phil, can I ask you to take a look at that
for me? The ISOs are in /home/stevem/wood-update at the moment.
I've generated these using an
Ok, the following source packages now use the srcpackage_cvs facility
at packages.qa.debian.org:
debian-installer (virtual for all the stuff under debian-installer)
boot-floppies
tasksel
debian-cd
base-config
mklibs
modconf
fai
This lets users subscribe to CVS messages as they de
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:55:57PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > | First of all, what do we want to build, the smaller ones 45 Mb
> > right now, | or the installable from cd ones, 83 Mb.
> >
> > Why not both?
>
> It's ok with me, we only need good names for them so that people
> know
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi Steve,
> CD1: src all alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
> CD2: src all mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
one query - is there any reason to generate this as two ISO images
rather than an upgrade ISO for each architecture which can then be
dropped into the e
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 10:58:19AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
>
>On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>> CD1: src all alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k
>> CD2: src all mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
>
>one query - is there any reason to generate this as two ISO images
>rather than
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> None, really - I just tried to fit them into a small number of CDs
> similar to the potato ones. It would be simple to generate separate
> CDs (11) for each arch if people would prefer that...?
my $0.02 is that it would be better to have a smaller ISO
quero que todo mundo se foda neste natal.
28 matches
Mail list logo
