cvs commit to debian-cd by hertzog

Repository: debian-cd who:hertzog time: Sat Apr 13 05:17:57 PDT 2002 Log Message: * Fix handling of NONFREE/EXTRANONFREE variable. * Update the order of the boot images for i386 : 1: isolinux multiboot 2: vanilla 3: compact 4: idepci 5: bf2.4 * Put ISOLINUX=

cvs commit to debian-cd/tools by hertzog

Repository: debian-cd/tools who:hertzog time: Sat Apr 13 05:17:57 PDT 2002 Log Message: * Fix handling of NONFREE/EXTRANONFREE variable. * Update the order of the boot images for i386 : 1: isolinux multiboot 2: vanilla 3: compact 4: idepci 5: bf2.4 * Put ISO

cvs commit to debian-cd/debian by hertzog

Repository: debian-cd/debian who:hertzog time: Sat Apr 13 05:17:57 PDT 2002 Log Message: * Fix handling of NONFREE/EXTRANONFREE variable. * Update the order of the boot images for i386 : 1: isolinux multiboot 2: vanilla 3: compact 4: idepci 5: bf2.4 * Put IS

cvs commit to debian-cd/tools/boot/woody by hertzog

Repository: debian-cd/tools/boot/woody who:hertzog time: Sat Apr 13 05:17:57 PDT 2002 Log Message: * Fix handling of NONFREE/EXTRANONFREE variable. * Update the order of the boot images for i386 : 1: isolinux multiboot 2: vanilla 3: compact 4: idepci 5: bf2.4

Re: cvs commit to debian-cd by hertzog

Le Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:17:57AM -0700, Debian Boot CVS Master écrivait: > * Fix handling of NONFREE/EXTRANONFREE variable. > * Update the order of the boot images for i386 : > 1: isolinux multiboot > 2: vanilla > 3: compact > 4: idepci > 5: bf2.4 > * Put ISOLINUX=1 by

Re: Optimising Debian-CD

[Philip Hands] > OK, attached is the output of cvs diff, wich includes changes for > ISOLINUX as well as my FASTSUMS change, and a tweak so I can skip doing > a mirrorcheck for the Nth time in the day. Now as the ISOLINUX patch is included in the current CVS version, could you make a new patch w

Documenting the MULTIBOOT option

Here is a patch to document the MULTIBOOT option. Please include in the next version. Index: CONF.sh === RCS file: /var/lib/cvs/skolelinux/src/debian-cd/CONF.sh,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.9 retrieving revision 1.38 diff -u -3 -p -

Woody non-US CDs

On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:40:41PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 11:09, Richard Atterer wrote: > > But again: I thought that beginning with woody there will no > > longer be two variants of the first CD? > > That would presumably be on the assumptions that all crypto packages

Jigdo-mirror

Hello, here is my first attempt at a script which makes it easy to maintain an up-to-date CD image mirror with jigdo. As usual, I got carried away and added some bells and whistles... :-7 - jigdo-mirror scans through one dir, looking at .jigdo files, extracts the image name and (re)creates the

Re: Please test this woody cd image

Mail in two parts, one to Raphael, another to debian-boot: Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This feature is the possibility to select a flavor to boot when you boot > from CD1 (instead of booting from a different CD for each flavor). This feature worked. I was able to start installat

Re: Announcing jigdo-easy 2.1 - please test

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 02:26:06AM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > I'd highly appreciate it if you did not change the template format > (again) until at least a month after Woody release. And when you do, > please announce it properly -- and including a patch to jigdo-port > (or -easy) would make me

jigdo!

I was just wandering thru the site and noticed that Jigdo is no being tested. I wanted to try it out but the link on the debian website to the jigdo hompage doesn't seem to work. I think the site has limited access now. I've read that this program in going to be in unstable. I wish it could m

Re: jigdo!

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 03:15:01PM -0500, Charlie Ebert wrote: > I was just wandering thru the site and noticed that Jigdo is no > being tested. I wanted to try it out but the link on the debian > website to the jigdo hompage doesn't seem to work. I think the site > has limited access now. Sorry

Re: Jigdo-mirror

Ah - while the previous version didn't delete all of your data, which was already very good, *this* version might also *work*, which is even better! ;-) Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key: | \/¯| http://atterer.net | U

Re: Bochs can be helpful for bootdisk testing

On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:37:03AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Another useful tool might be user-mode Linux: > http://user-mode-linux.sf.net Absolutely; UML has been able to be used for installation testing for quite some time now. (available in unstable and woody as user-mode-linux) --

Re: Bochs can be helpful for bootdisk testing

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:05:57PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Absolutely; UML has been able to be used for installation testing for quite > some time now. Even more if initrd would be compiled in. Regards, Christian Leber -- "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non da

MD5SUM File ISO signature checking ??

    Hi Debian-cd,   I want to check file 'MD5SUM' signature for 2.2 rev 6 i386   #gpg --verify MD5SUM gpg: Signature made Fri Apr 5 20:38:10 2002 CEST using DSA key ID DD9B9910 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found   --- I asked already that question for 2.2 rev

Re: Bochs can be helpful for bootdisk testing

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 11:16:32PM +0200, Christian Leber wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:05:57PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > Absolutely; UML has been able to be used for installation testing for quite > > some time now. > > Even more if initrd would be compiled in. Consider it done