*****SPAM***** ÀÚ·áÀÔ´Ï´Ù

ÀÌ°÷Àº Á¦¸ñÀÔ´Ï´Ù ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇϽôµ¥ ²À ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ¾öû Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°Ý¿¡ ÆË´Ï´Ù ÃÖ½ÅÇ®¹öÀü°ÔÀÓ. ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ°ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥. ¼ºÀνõð µîµî ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ ¸ðµç½Ãµð°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù ÃֽŸñ·ÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¹°·Ð ½Å¿ëÀº ±âº»ÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¾ÐÃàÈ­ÀϼÓÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» º¸½ÅÈÄ ÀüÈ­³ª ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½

*****SPAM***** ÀÚ·áÀÔ´Ï´Ù

ÀÌ°÷Àº Á¦¸ñÀÔ´Ï´Ù ÄÄÇ»Å͸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇϽôµ¥ ²À ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ °ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥À» ¾öû Àú·ÅÇÑ °¡°Ý¿¡ ÆË´Ï´Ù ÃÖ½ÅÇ®¹öÀü°ÔÀÓ. ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ°ü·ÃÇÁ·Î±×·¥. ¼ºÀνõð µîµî ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ¿¡ °ü·ÃµÈ ¸ðµç½Ãµð°¡ ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù ÃֽŸñ·ÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¹°·Ð ½Å¿ëÀº ±âº»ÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¾ÐÃàÈ­ÀϼÓÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» º¸½ÅÈÄ ÀüÈ­³ª ¸ÞÀÏ·Î ¿¬¶ôÁֽʽÿä ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³½

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

#include Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM: > > And last, woody ought to be 2.2 based and not 2.4 based ... but since I > > also find it lame to use 2.2.x by default nowadays ... > > > > I disagree, 2.4.x kernels have been out for over 2 years.we should > not release a "n

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM: > > > And last, woody ought to be 2.2 based and not 2.4 based ... but since I > > > also find it lame to use 2.2.x by default nowadays ... > > > > > > > I disagree, 2

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM: > > > And last, woody ought to be 2.2 based and not 2.4 based ... but since I > > > also find it lame to use 2.2.x by default nowadays ... > > I disagree, 2.4.x kernel

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:00:08PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > 2.4 is not the default kernel for woody installs, 2.2 is. Oh, and is already clear to everyone involved, this is for i386. Other ports obviously have 2.4 kernels as default. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

esto te ayuda

ENVIAMOS SU PUBLICIDAD POR E MAIL ->Mas de 390 bases EXCLUSIVAS (por rubro, provincia, pais...) ->NOSOTROS hacemos el envio (no tenga problemas con su servidor) ->BUSQUEDAS de emails segun "palabra clave" ->Carga de SU PAGINA WEB en el Outlook del receptor ->Promociones especiales $5 CADA 1000 M

2.2_r6 CDs at cdimage.d.o

Hi Folks, Sorry about the delay, I'm afraid the release slipped by without my noticing it. In future, feel free to Cc: me in on the "Where are the new CD images" message you send here, just to make sure that (as happened in this case) I'd not been desubscribed from the list, and been busy enough

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

> A more conservative way to get the language chooser going would be to > put compact or idepci on the first disk. It doesn't require 2.4 as > such. I've got one more suggestion. I think we can load first very small 2.2 boot kernel, next display "kernel choose" dialog, and next start the installa

[Fwd: Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??]

I used "reply" rather than "reply to list" by mistake. --- Begin Message --- On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 01:00, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM: > > > I disagree, 2.4.x kernels have been

[Fwd: Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??]

... and again. --- Begin Message --- On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 17:47, David Kimdon wrote: > Yes, the bf2.4 kernel is described in the woody release notes as "an > experimental flavor". How hard is it to edit a text file? Fire up your "pico", boys. > However, debian-boot doesn't decide what the

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 On Friday 05 April 2002 01:00, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > > > > GUYS, _STOP IT_. > > NOW IS _NOT_ THE TIME TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE WAY THE INSTALL WORKS. > aj, I do not want t

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 19:45, Jim Westveer wrote: > Before you lam-bast me with a nastygram, please grab > or create a copy of the woody CD's, and try an installation with > CD#1 as the disk you innitially boot from, then try the > CD#3 with the bf24 kernel. The first thing you will notice > is

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Apr 05, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 19:45, Jim Westveer wrote: > > Before you lam-bast me with a nastygram, please grab > > or create a copy of the woody CD's, and try an installation with > > CD#1 as the disk you innitially boot from, then try the > > CD#3 with the bf24 ke

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

#include Anthony Towns wrote on Fri Apr 05, 2002 um 07:00:08PM: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:07:38AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > > Jim Westveer wrote on Thu Apr 04, 2002 um 05:24:24PM: > > > > And last, woody ought to be 2.2 based and not 2.4 based ... but since I > > > > also find

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

Please take me of the Cc of this thread. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:59:05PM +0100 wrote: > On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 19:45, Jim Westveer wrote: > > Before you lam-bast me with a nastygram, please grab > > or create a copy of the woody CD's, and try an installation with > > CD#1 as the disk you innitially boot from, then try the > > CD#3 with

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:50:50PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > > cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vanilla > > Any seconds? seconded. -john -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 On Friday 05 April 2002 16:50, David Kimdon wrote: > Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:59:05PM +0100 wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 19:45, Jim Westveer wrote: > > aph and I were just talking on irc, how about : > > cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vani

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 05:00:45PM -0800 wrote: > > cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vanilla > > SCSI??? is there such a devil ? > Its not in bf 3.0.22-2002-04-03 ;-/ s/scsi/compact/ I got a second, any oppos

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 02:40, David Kimdon wrote: > Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 05:00:45PM -0800 wrote: > > > cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vanilla > > > > SCSI??? is there such a devil ? > > Its not in bf 3.0.2

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:45:21AM -0800, Jim Westveer wrote: > On Friday 05 April 2002 01:00, Anthony Towns wrote: > > GUYS, _STOP IT_. > > NOW IS _NOT_ THE TIME TO MAKE CHANGES TO THE WAY THE INSTALL WORKS. > I am not suggesting changing anything in how the install > works, or anything to do wit

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 06:22, Anthony Towns wrote: > I'm not really sure what part of "_STOP IT_" is so difficult to > understand, but please _STOP IT_. If you want to move the bf2.4 kernel > images onto the CD#2 bootsector, that's fine. But the default kernel > for woody, and hence the image that

Re: 2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??

On Sat Apr 06, 2002 at 08:10:16AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > The ISOLINUX/MEMDISK thing mentioned earlier looks interesting. Has > anyone played with this? Presumably we could use MEMDISK to select I've used Isolinux. It works for me. Lets me select from multiple kernels on CD, with no obno