Hello all,
I was typing up a long, rambling email about P-I-K but I'll
spare you all and just post the conclusions that I came to.
1). I think that the '.list' and ISO's should contain either
a revision number (for Official releases) or a date stamp (for
the testing/unstable 'releases'). This wou
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:22:26AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach »Richard Atterer« am 2001-09-03 um 23:35:59 +0200 :
> > also available for Mac OS 9 (GTK+ is for OS X only). However,
> > currently I lean towards GTK+ since it is more "mainstream" and more
> > likely to be ported to fur
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:01:17PM +0100, Simon Wood wrote:
> I was typing up a long, rambling email about P-I-K but I'll
> spare you all and just post the conclusions that I came to.
I got equally fed up with the PIK last December, and have been working
on a replacement since then. Maybe yo
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:05:02PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> sounds like an excellent reason debootstrap should NOT include
> non-free in the list of Packages files it requires.
Ethan, take a pill already. You don't have to make every email a flame.
In debian-cd's case, it shouldn't list no
4 matches
Mail list logo
